Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Music Appreciation

LoisB

(12,429 posts)

6. None of his argument. I object to the heading that reads "the Beatles are better than the

Reply to marble falls (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 19, 2026, 02:34 AM

5 hrs ago

Stones". I did not hear him say that in the video. There is no way the Beatles were "better" than the Stones; different but certainly not better - in my humble opinion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Beatles are better than the Stones (w Lemmy from Motorhead) [View all] marble falls 13 hrs ago OP

I've seen something like this where he equates Liverpool to Norfolk Va underpants 13 hrs ago #1

Didn't Need Lemmy To Convince Me! ProfessorGAC 13 hrs ago #2

I always felt the Beatles were working class and the Stones were uppermiddle class. I felt like I was the only one ... marble falls 12 hrs ago #3

Bull crap. LoisB 9 hrs ago #4

What part of his argument do you dispute? That the Beatles came up lower class and the Rolling Stones ... marble falls 9 hrs ago #5

None of his argument. I object to the heading that reads "the Beatles are better than the LoisB 5 hrs ago #6