Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

itsrigged

(116 posts)
15. That does not mean the results are right or that they were not changed during voting..
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jul 2012

Some of these machines that print a paper total and have memory cards are rigged to flip the votes on both so they match a fraudulent result... that is the point why these machines can not be trusted... unless you are talking about fill in the dot paper ballots that you hand counted and compared the hand count of individual fill in the dot paper ballots dropped into a ballot box that were scanned by comparing a hand count to a scan count because even the venders scanners can be hacked to flip votes and not count properly as by being hacked and having a malicious virus installed ...

This was proven and demonstrated on a Diebold scanner that counted fill in the dot ballots... unless the ballots would of been hand counted and compared to the scanner count the fraud of flipping votes from one to another which they wanted to win would never be found... so, if the only way to verify the count is to hand count, why use a machine in the first place if you are never going to hand count to make sure any particular machine may of been rigged?







http://markcrispinmiller.com/2011/04/400000-votes-still-missing-from-wi-state-data-bev-harris/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»People need to see these ...»Reply #15