Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(125,714 posts)
2. Orange, Wake, and Columbus have partial reports
Tue May 8, 2012, 06:48 PM
May 2012

Orange and Wake are voting against One, Columbus voting for
One currently passing 53-47

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NCSBoE webpage for Primary Results [View all] struggle4progress May 2012 OP
Polls should be closed, and results should start trickling in soon struggle4progress May 2012 #1
Orange, Wake, and Columbus have partial reports struggle4progress May 2012 #2
Orange 40-50% turnout, Wake 10-20% turnout, Columbus 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #5
Partial report from Sampson, voting for One struggle4progress May 2012 #3
Sampson 20-30% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #6
Partial report from Currituck, voting for One struggle4progress May 2012 #4
Currituck 0 - 10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #7
Northhampton for, 0 - 10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #8
Randolph for, 10 - 20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #9
Lincoln for, 30 - 40% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #10
Alexander for, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #11
Macon for, 10 - 20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #12
Currently For 55-45 struggle4progress May 2012 #13
Martin for, 0 - 10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #14
Stokes for, 0-10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #15
Surry for, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #16
Gaston for, 20-30% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #17
Pamlico for, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #18
Currently 55-45% for, with 617K ballots counted struggle4progress May 2012 #19
Avery for, 0-10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #20
Transylvania for, 10 - 20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #21
Carteret for, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #22
Pitt for, 10 - 20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #23
Catawba for, 0 - 10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #24
Wilkes for, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #25
Union for, 0 - 10% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #26
Yancey for, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #27
Currently for, 57-43% struggle4progress May 2012 #28
Chowan, Bertie, Jones, Rowan, McDowell, Graham for struggle4progress May 2012 #29
Wautauga against, 10-20% turnout struggle4progress May 2012 #30
57-43% for with 734K ballots counted struggle4progress May 2012 #31
Buncombe and Guilford have come in Against, but they're surrounded by a sea of For struggle4progress May 2012 #32
So far about 44 counties For, 5 Against struggle4progress May 2012 #33
Ugh.... ProfessionalLeftist May 2012 #36
Waiting on Mecklenberg, Forsyth, and Durham IMO struggle4progress May 2012 #34
We're gettin creamed 60-40% with 1048K ballots counted struggle4progress May 2012 #35
We are not going to make this up, are we? wildeyed May 2012 #37
Doesn't look good. mmonk May 2012 #39
There are 6296K registered voters in the state. I have no idea what the actual turnout this time is. struggle4progress May 2012 #40
They called it. wildeyed May 2012 #41
Durham should reduce the margin some, I think struggle4progress May 2012 #42
Hopefully. wildeyed May 2012 #43
Chatham county now appears in the against column struggle4progress May 2012 #44
Forsyth and Mecklenburg Against struggle4progress May 2012 #38
Still waiting for Durham to report: not sure what Durham's waiting for struggle4progress May 2012 #45
Some county results: struggle4progress May 2012 #46
Anybody seen numbers Rittermeister May 2012 #47
Nevermind Rittermeister May 2012 #48
AGAINST results (as of today): struggle4progress May 2012 #49
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»NCSBoE webpage for Primar...»Reply #2