Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. This is a big mistake -- for both of them.
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 03:36 AM
Dec 2011

They should make a deal. We have so few progressives in Congress and this could make it difficult to get either of them elected. If nothing else, this is a waste of progressive energy to say nothing of money. Surely one of them could run for a different office.

They are both so good.

I always vote, but one time two good candidates -- two of my friends were competing for an office. I was very busy, but more than anything, I did not want to vote because it would mean voting against one or the other of them. So I stayed home.

It was a good thing that I didn't vote because each of them called me after the election to ask whether I had voted for them.

It's an awful feeling -- to have to choose between two good candidates both of whom would do a great job. It can cause people to sit out the election.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Democrats»The Hill: Kucinich to ch...»Reply #3