Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
46. They are not. They are very well established, old
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:59 PM
May 2016

respectable liberal and progressive government concepts and realities depending on where one is.

But that is not what I'm talking about. Which, btw, is also is well established, at least as well as anything in this world of exploding knowledge can be expected to be.

Introduction to Political Psychology: 3rd Edition
Political Psychology: Neuroscience, Genetics, and Politics
Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty
The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology: Second Edition
The Rationalizing Voter (Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology)
Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment
The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation

I quickly grabbed this little list off the web, deleting Jihad, Islam, and terrorism/terrorist to keep it closer to DU home, but of course there is incredibly more published in these disciplines. In the interest of disclosure, I have not read these particular books, although I have one very well regarded interdisciplinary book, and some are pretty expensive, but fwiw I did have a unit on political psychology 40 years ago.

Extremism is very real, if amorphous and sometimes hard to define. And we pretend it is not literally at our peril, for some I am coming to suspect literally at the peril of their ability to think rationally on political topics.

Barbara Boxer is not a bitch or the "C" word. [View all] Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author dogman May 2016 #1
Doesn't matter, Kelvin Mace May 2016 #4
Not innocent, so she deserved it I guess? Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #5
No, I understand this is not the proper reply to your post. dogman May 2016 #13
No one deserves to be called either of those derogatory terms liberal N proud May 2016 #2
Amen! Anyone, and I mean ANYONE Kelvin Mace May 2016 #3
So you want to ban a bunch of Bernie... scscholar May 2016 #6
Sorry, inclusiveness doesn't extend to such behaviour. Kelvin Mace May 2016 #8
Yes. Their behavior was unacceptable. leftofcool May 2016 #9
Do Bernie supporters have to use sexist language against women? Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #19
As a female Bernie supporter, I heartily agree.. whathehell May 2016 #42
Agreed. nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #45
Those Bernie supporters are bigots who deny women equal respect.. whathehell May 2016 #28
And Francisco Franco is still dead RufusTFirefly May 2016 #7
There are claims about phone messages Kelvin Mace May 2016 #11
Barbara Boxer was DemonGoddess May 2016 #10
I have heard that these things were said in phone messages, left by people Kelvin Mace May 2016 #12
On CNN today DemonGoddess May 2016 #15
Again, where is the video? Kelvin Mace May 2016 #23
As the videos are all over the damn place DemonGoddess May 2016 #52
Sure, and when I track down video Kelvin Mace May 2016 #53
Reportedly only about half the Bernie delegates showed up Hortensis May 2016 #16
That's not quite true. zalinda May 2016 #24
This has been investigated, and the rules were followed Hortensis May 2016 #27
Investigated by who? frylock May 2016 #33
WHO? Go look! All the nation's political media Hortensis May 2016 #36
So it wasn't investigated then. frylock May 2016 #38
Gee, I think you win. Here's your prize: Hortensis May 2016 #43
I'm just happy to call out your bullshit for all to see. frylock May 2016 #44
How about this investigation zalinda May 2016 #50
Actually, no woman deserves to be attacked with gender slurs. Her character may deserve whathehell May 2016 #30
Yup - a key characteristic of left-wing extremist behavior. Hortensis May 2016 #14
I dont like calling them left wing, though. I think they simply want certain economic things Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #18
Well, there is something to that, but I think it is Hortensis May 2016 #25
I don't think that decent wages and free college and universal health care are examples of extremism immoderate May 2016 #37
They are not. They are very well established, old Hortensis May 2016 #46
What the hell does this have to do with anything? zalinda May 2016 #48
She was an intruder, neither a candidate nor a delegate. Downwinder May 2016 #17
Wow. So everybody there who was not either was an intruder? Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #20
Read the Rules. Downwinder May 2016 #21
So everybody, right? Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #22
Strange position for sure. Senator Boxer was invited, and she Hortensis May 2016 #26
Nina Turner was invited also, by Bernie Sanders campaign, and she was also neither Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #41
Riiight, and of course she was there for Bernie and Hortensis May 2016 #47
So call her that...Her gender is not fair game. n/t whathehell May 2016 #32
Alls I recall is the video of St. Barbara the Exhaulted telling Berniestas, "Go ahead and boo all Hoppy May 2016 #29
Hoppy, if you can't tell the diffference in tone between "boo all you want" and "fuck you" Nitram May 2016 #35
"Vote she expects" ahh, another BoB Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #40
Good luck reasoning with Bernie supporters. Nitram May 2016 #31
I'm a Bernie supporter who despises the ugly misogyny whathehell May 2016 #39
I prefer the gender-neutral term 'asshole' frylock May 2016 #34
True, and we should stop calling men zalinda May 2016 #49
You are exactly right. Consider the source. notadmblnd May 2016 #51
Clueless is as clueless does Snood May 2016 #54
And Clinton supporters have shown themselves to be at the head of the pack notadmblnd May 2016 #55
Welcome! jzodda May 2016 #56
Thanks and an inquiry Snood May 2016 #57
Good question but I think.... jzodda May 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Democrats»Barbara Boxer is not a bi...»Reply #46