Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: This deserves to be seen, not hidden [View all]PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)105. I was juror #3
On Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:53 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Blackmail just so charming!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=111667
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This poster repeatedly posted a right wing video that not only depicts Sen Sanders as an enemy of the US but also President Obama as a Muslim communist and now they're accusing supporters of blackmail. Enough of the swift boating and character assassination of both Sanders and his supporters..
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:59 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Dear alerter,
You have clearly alerted on the wrong post or are alert stalking in a spectacular fashion. Just hide the thread, ignore the poster or bring it to admins attention. What you're doing is creepy. Just stop. You make DU suck.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you don't feel a discussion on just what the not yet vetted candidate
HillareeeHillaraah
Apr 2016
#37
Are we spreading it or presenting just what he would be up against as the nominee?
HillareeeHillaraah
Apr 2016
#43
This is what the ads would have looked like if he were the nominee. No wonder the Republicans want
redstatebluegirl
Apr 2016
#7
Yes, they probably used the juxtaposition with the avowed Socialist Sanders in order to smear Obama.
Surya Gayatri
Apr 2016
#59
Everyone copy and paste the link to the video somewhere so we can re-post it . . .
brush
Apr 2016
#53
Now, imagine 25 variations of that ... shorter, punchier, better production values ...
NurseJackie
Apr 2016
#20
This is a statement of just what the right wing would do to Sanders as nominee
HillareeeHillaraah
Apr 2016
#46
You dont believe that I'm certain this is an example of the right wing play book?
HillareeeHillaraah
Apr 2016
#52
Many of us have known about the Nicaraqua/Cuba/Moscow connections in Sanders' . . .
brush
Apr 2016
#56
But the Democratic party has no obligation to let non-Democrats run as Democrats.
Koinos
Apr 2016
#66
#1. It's in the Democratic Party's interest to not have a Leftwing candidate run as a 3rd party.
KittyWampus
Apr 2016
#70
I would respectfully disagree that this is like a BB (won't spell it out as it offends some)
HillareeeHillaraah
Apr 2016
#78
They think that BS does better in Polls against Trump or any of the GOP candidates?
Her Sister
Apr 2016
#88
You have interesting point of view on BS supporters since you've been here so long!
Her Sister
Apr 2016
#92
Heads up, you're being alert stalked. I just served on a jury for this reply.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2016
#104