Hillary Clinton

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

7. For male-centric United States? Yes. As liberal as we would like our country to be, men of all

Mon May 16, 2016, 01:23 PM

May 2016

demographics still have problems stereotyping women in our culture(s). It's especially strong in the Latino community (although Hillary is one tough cookie, and they know it and don't really have a problem with her, specifically).

Let's break one glass ceiling at a time, yallerdawg, and let's be realistic about it. Let's not try and overplay our hand. Hillary's got this IF she doesn't mess up before November, and choosing Warren as her VP running mate will almost certainly cause her trouble she doesn't need now that Republicans are slowly uniting around that bigot on their side.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Markos Moulitsas: Yeah, I changed my mind. Elizabeth Warren for VP! [View all] Rose Siding May 2016 OP

Gore and Biden are examples of impactful Democratic VP's in the office! yallerdawg May 2016 #1

Nope. Two women on the ticket will be a surefire way to lose to Trump. Hands down. BlueCaliDem May 2016 #2

The demographics issue is one that holds me back Rose Siding May 2016 #4

I feel the same way as you do, Rose, although I'm less on the distrust BlueCaliDem May 2016 #8

Are you suggesting "two women" is too much? yallerdawg May 2016 #6

For male-centric United States? Yes. As liberal as we would like our country to be, men of all BlueCaliDem May 2016 #7

I don't think Warren is interested in the Veep slot at this time. MynameisBlarney May 2016 #3

I don't believe for a second the Clinton camp is remotely considering Warren,,, KittyWampus May 2016 #5

I like the idea, on so many levels. Koinos May 2016 #9

I don't know if Warren will be the VP pick,although it sufrommich May 2016 #10