Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
36. lol. Sorry, mercuryblues. I thought those were your words.
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jun 2016

Perhaps, in the future and to avoid misunderstandings and confusion, you might want to put someone's quoted words between quotation marks? Just a suggestion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, her searches of their attic and basement did not result in found tax returns. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
We'll never know because Andrea Mitchell was too busy allowing the woman to pontificate and LIE BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #3
Watching reporters interview people can be so frustrating sarae Jun 2016 #23
2,383 is half of the total that includes superdelegates. The obvious losing side doesn't get to BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #2
Math is not their strongest suit - especially when it makes them look bad or look like they're BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #5
Yep. Just checked. The 4,765 total delegates incl. pledged *and* unpledged (super) delegates. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #8
It is more than a bit on the arrogant side brer cat Jun 2016 #4
I would bet the parameters were set in advance of the "interview" pandr32 Jun 2016 #6
Then the question would be, why did they allow it? Why did Andrea allow any conditions to be set BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #7
Simple answer: there must be a horse race!!!!! displacedtexan Jun 2016 #24
Jane is so full of it workinclasszero Jun 2016 #9
Which suit @ msnbc passed on their mantle to let jane sanders call the shots? Cha Jun 2016 #10
I'm asking that same question, Cha. Can you recall when it was the last time @msnbc had Bill Clinton BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #14
No, it's burnie burnie jane burnie burnie jane, burnie burnie jane, burnie jane sanders... crammed Cha Jun 2016 #15
And may I also note... HillareeeHillaraah Jun 2016 #39
Mon Dieu! Both Sanders must have failed math on the way to the revolution SharonClark Jun 2016 #11
Well, considering the math Jane used that's now bankrupting Burlington College, there's a case to be BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #12
WTF? Andrea didn't ask Jane about their tax returns or Burlington College? SunSeeker Jun 2016 #13
Not a word! You'd think she'd take that opportunity once Jane came out of her hiding place. But no. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #19
So Jane Sanders gets to set journalistic rules? NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #16
jane and bernie saying something that is patently false and goes against beachbum bob Jun 2016 #17
"nov 8 will be a great celebration for america electing our first female president" BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #18
Hugs and kisses! Her Sister Jun 2016 #21
Hugs and kisses back, HS! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #25
I drove my employer into bankruptcy and all I got with this lousy 6 figure payoff msongs Jun 2016 #20
Well, if you did that!? Not cool! Her Sister Jun 2016 #22
I know, HS! Were it Hillary rather than Jane, the M$M would be crucifying her as we speak! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #27
When we get to the next chapter! Don't worry Her Sister Jun 2016 #29
I take your point but Jane's not the candidate. If Bill did it, he'd not get a pass from the press! Rose Siding Jun 2016 #32
This is typical of them, of late DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #26
That's not socialism. That's autocracy! What about that don't his followers see or understand?? BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #28
On wolf blitzer mercuryblues Jun 2016 #30
"he's won a number of races by large margins. By 70,75,82,86%." You forgot to add: in smaller States BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #33
those were Jane's words mercuryblues Jun 2016 #35
lol. Sorry, mercuryblues. I thought those were your words. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #36
not a problem mercuryblues Jun 2016 #37
Thank you. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #38
his campaign attacked Boxer, too and she also has a high approval rating. He is going for broke DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #40
To better expose Jane Sanders and even Andrea Mitchell it might be better to use twitter LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #31
Thanks for the tip, LiberalFighter. I'll keep that in mind when tweeting. I didn't know this. :-) BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Jane Sanders on MSNBC thi...»Reply #36