Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
In reply to the discussion: Jane Sanders on MSNBC this morning, saying that news media are NOT allowed to say [View all]BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)36. lol. Sorry, mercuryblues. I thought those were your words.
Perhaps, in the future and to avoid misunderstandings and confusion, you might want to put someone's quoted words between quotation marks? Just a suggestion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jane Sanders on MSNBC this morning, saying that news media are NOT allowed to say [View all]
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
OP
So, her searches of their attic and basement did not result in found tax returns.
tonyt53
Jun 2016
#1
We'll never know because Andrea Mitchell was too busy allowing the woman to pontificate and LIE
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#3
2,383 is half of the total that includes superdelegates. The obvious losing side doesn't get to
BobbyDrake
Jun 2016
#2
Math is not their strongest suit - especially when it makes them look bad or look like they're
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#5
Yep. Just checked. The 4,765 total delegates incl. pledged *and* unpledged (super) delegates.
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#8
Then the question would be, why did they allow it? Why did Andrea allow any conditions to be set
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#7
I'm asking that same question, Cha. Can you recall when it was the last time @msnbc had Bill Clinton
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#14
No, it's burnie burnie jane burnie burnie jane, burnie burnie jane, burnie jane sanders... crammed
Cha
Jun 2016
#15
Well, considering the math Jane used that's now bankrupting Burlington College, there's a case to be
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#12
Not a word! You'd think she'd take that opportunity once Jane came out of her hiding place. But no.
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#19
"nov 8 will be a great celebration for america electing our first female president"
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#18
I drove my employer into bankruptcy and all I got with this lousy 6 figure payoff
msongs
Jun 2016
#20
I know, HS! Were it Hillary rather than Jane, the M$M would be crucifying her as we speak!
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#27
I take your point but Jane's not the candidate. If Bill did it, he'd not get a pass from the press!
Rose Siding
Jun 2016
#32
That's not socialism. That's autocracy! What about that don't his followers see or understand??
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#28
"he's won a number of races by large margins. By 70,75,82,86%." You forgot to add: in smaller States
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#33
his campaign attacked Boxer, too and she also has a high approval rating. He is going for broke
DLCWIdem
Jun 2016
#40
To better expose Jane Sanders and even Andrea Mitchell it might be better to use twitter
LiberalFighter
Jun 2016
#31
Thanks for the tip, LiberalFighter. I'll keep that in mind when tweeting. I didn't know this. :-)
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#34