Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why Is President Obama Embracing Hillary Clinton Now? [View all]
This is an interesting read by someone who appears to be a SBS supporter, however one feels about the ultimate conclusion. http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/why-is-president-obama-embracing-hillary-clinton
A couple of weeks ago, on NBCs Meet the Press, Denis McDonough, the White House chief of staff, appeared to indicate that President Obama wouldnt be backing anyone in the Democratic primary. The President would vote in the Illinois primary, on March 15th, and campaign for whichever candidate emerged from the process, McDonough said. Now, though, Obama has come very close to issuing a public endorsement of Hillary Clinton.
...
Was Obama just shooting the breeze with a guest in the Oval Office who happened to be carrying a tape recorder? Hardly. It is much more plausible that the President was sending a supportive message to an embattled candidate whom he sees as the best option to replace him, in order to safeguard the electoral position of the Democratic Party and preserve his legacy as a center-left reformer.
For all the differences they had in 2008, some of which lingered, Obama and Clinton both represent the centrist, pragmatic approach to politics that has dominated the Democratic Party since the nineteen-eighties. A victory for Sanders and his insurgent left-wing populism would represent a sharp break with the moderate tradition. In the opinion of many Democrats in the White House and on Capitol Hill, it would also set up the Party for defeat come November, not just in the Presidential race but in congressional elections. And, from Obamas perspective, it would place a shadow over his biggest achievements, particularly the Affordable Care Act, which Sanders has described as merely a first step in transforming the health-care system.
If the Republicans win the Presidential election and strengthen their grip on Congress, they are likely to repeal large parts of the Affordable Care Act and roll back many of President Obamas executive orders in other areas, such as environmental regulation. If Sanders were to become President, he would presumably seek to build on Obamas policies, but there would still be a significant change in approach. In part to try to prevent either of these things from happening, a number of former Obama Administration officials are working for the Clinton campaign. John Podesta, Clintons campaign chairman, worked at the White House under Obama. So did Jennifer Palmieri, the Clinton campaigns director of communications. Joel Benenson, a senior strategist and pollster for the Clinton campaign, carried out a similar role in Obamas 2008 and 2012 campaigns. The Sanders campaign doesnt have these sorts of personal ties to the White House.
...
Was Obama just shooting the breeze with a guest in the Oval Office who happened to be carrying a tape recorder? Hardly. It is much more plausible that the President was sending a supportive message to an embattled candidate whom he sees as the best option to replace him, in order to safeguard the electoral position of the Democratic Party and preserve his legacy as a center-left reformer.
For all the differences they had in 2008, some of which lingered, Obama and Clinton both represent the centrist, pragmatic approach to politics that has dominated the Democratic Party since the nineteen-eighties. A victory for Sanders and his insurgent left-wing populism would represent a sharp break with the moderate tradition. In the opinion of many Democrats in the White House and on Capitol Hill, it would also set up the Party for defeat come November, not just in the Presidential race but in congressional elections. And, from Obamas perspective, it would place a shadow over his biggest achievements, particularly the Affordable Care Act, which Sanders has described as merely a first step in transforming the health-care system.
If the Republicans win the Presidential election and strengthen their grip on Congress, they are likely to repeal large parts of the Affordable Care Act and roll back many of President Obamas executive orders in other areas, such as environmental regulation. If Sanders were to become President, he would presumably seek to build on Obamas policies, but there would still be a significant change in approach. In part to try to prevent either of these things from happening, a number of former Obama Administration officials are working for the Clinton campaign. John Podesta, Clintons campaign chairman, worked at the White House under Obama. So did Jennifer Palmieri, the Clinton campaigns director of communications. Joel Benenson, a senior strategist and pollster for the Clinton campaign, carried out a similar role in Obamas 2008 and 2012 campaigns. The Sanders campaign doesnt have these sorts of personal ties to the White House.
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
hmm. Wasn't Hillary SOS under the Obama administration from 2009 - 2013? The title of the article
still_one
Jan 2016
#1
Yes, she did! And I thought that was incredibly admirable of her. Party over political pettiness,
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2016
#21
And, I ask.. "Why not?" He has geniune affection and admiration for her.. why not state the
Cha
Jan 2016
#3
I doubt that Bernie will activly support the Democratic nominee if he isn't
comradebillyboy
Jan 2016
#14
BS supporters have claimed all along that the president has put his thumb on the scale. Let me just
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2016
#16