Why Is President Obama Embracing Hillary Clinton Now?

[BlueMTexpat]

7. The article certainly isn't overly complimentary

to Hillary, IMO. It's clear from the last part of it that the writer is a SBS supporter. But it is not completely nasty as all too many are. And in spite of himself, the author still makes an excellent case for Prez O's recent comments about and in support of Hillary.

Support is simply not there among the majority for this nebulous "revolution" that SBS espouses.

Interestingly, because the second season of Poldark is coming up on the Beeb, I've been reading the Poldark novels (UK version). The US versions were quite watered down when they were originally published. I'm not sure whether that is still the case.

Apart from the Poldark family saga which is the purpose of the novels, the novels also detail the social situation in Britain (especially in Cornwall). They also describe the era between the First US Revolutionary War and the heightened social uneasiness in Britain not only because of the loss of its US colonies but also because of events France in 1789 and the chaos that followed the toppling of the monarchy there prior to Napoleon's taking firm grasp of things (and then going too far) quite vividly, although fictionalized in aspects, of course. It has been interesting to see that many of Ross Poldar's thoughts about social change parallel my own.

I'm not sure whether those who advocate "revolution" really know what they are advocating for. If they could provide some realistic details and steps, that would be great. But the sweeping generalizations that I have seen to justify "revolution" are simply not realistic. Chaos simply for the sake of chaos will not advance anything in today's America. But it will make things worse.