Hillary Clinton

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

5. Well, jmowreader has a point. It's a little confusing to read but after a couple of times I

Mon Feb 22, 2016, 01:06 AM

Feb 2016

got what you meant. Otherwise, your post is pretty spot on. I don't see how Bernie will be able to overcome that deficit after Hillary wins so many States so handily. I just don't see a path for him to win the nomination. Let's not forget that as she gains momentum after SC and then begins winning the Southern States, it's going to be extremely hard for him to win a sizable amount of delegates to beat her...and the super delegates (a Tad Devine idea) will certainly not switch to him.

I just don't see a pathway for him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just did some very very rough math.. [View all] HillDawg Feb 2016 OP

I think you're right. BainsBane Feb 2016 #1

Even then, HillDawg Feb 2016 #2

Do you have time to slightly edit this? jmowreader Feb 2016 #3

You have the night shift HillDawg Feb 2016 #4

Well, jmowreader has a point. It's a little confusing to read but after a couple of times I BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #5

I agree HillDawg Feb 2016 #6

:-) You didn't come across that way. I know you were j/k BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #8

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #7

And that's entirely possible barring a sudden upset win for Bernie in SC. But I don't see it. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #9

The math is against Sanders Gothmog Feb 2016 #10

Yes, in so many ways. nt SunSeeker Feb 2016 #11