Hillary Clinton

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

40. Total site-wide moderation might be impractical ... but ...

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:16 PM

Feb 2016

... having human moderators to keep an eye on the jury results could be a good start. (Even if it was just regular "spot-checking"... kinda like random drug testing for law enforcement jobs. It won't catch everyone, but it will discourage abuse and perhaps eliminate the obvious repeat offenders.)

Having alerts be NOT anonymous would probably help. Having longer time-outs when a jury votes 7-0 against hiding would also help. Perhaps having daily limits would prevent stalking-type behavior. Maybe 6-1 or 5-2 results would be the break-point for a 24 hour waiting period. Automatic review for 4-3 "close calls" of hidden posts would be a positive change.

Of course, all of these suggestions would require additional programming and testing of the code. Code doesn't just write itself... so it's likely to be at least a year before anything meaningful happens.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Leftofcool ... stay strong! We love you! See you soon! xo xo xo xo [View all] NurseJackie Feb 2016 OP

Why was that thread locked? Beaverhausen Feb 2016 #1

It was hidden. worse. Cha Feb 2016 #3

You're correct! It is beyond ridiculous! Skinner really needs to do something. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #4

Because only Susan Saradon or Bernie supporters are allowed to use such terminology still_one Feb 2016 #32

Sigh. I can't even type what I'm thinking... lunamagica Feb 2016 #2

.. Cha Feb 2016 #5

I just gave that a rec. How ridiculous DU has become. nt UtahLib Feb 2016 #6

same here, they cannot alert against that........ yet still_one Feb 2016 #33

Kick and so highly recommended. William769 Feb 2016 #7

I keep posting, Loki Feb 2016 #8

Did I or did I not just see a thread about voting with the girly bits.... all american girl Feb 2016 #9

And meanwhile people are posting shit Codeine Feb 2016 #28

Oh yeah, on another thread I basically got called dumb and uninformed because I'm a woman all american girl Feb 2016 #30

This is ridiculous GusBob Feb 2016 #10

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #11

Idiotic. johnp3907 Feb 2016 #12

We need to compile all these ridiculous hides in one place. sufrommich Feb 2016 #13

Yes! johnp3907 Feb 2016 #14

And another ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #16

Oh my God! sufrommich Feb 2016 #17

Is this a discussion board? I am starting to wonder still_one Feb 2016 #34

I reced it just because it was locked Coolest Ranger Feb 2016 #15

I am so glad you reminded me brer cat Feb 2016 #20

Good idea. eom fleabiscuit Feb 2016 #24

Done! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #42

Ugh BillyDawg Feb 2016 #18

Yes shenmue Feb 2016 #19

That OP was locked? mcar Feb 2016 #21

I agree. (I hope that Skinner will figure out a plan to address the problem) NurseJackie Feb 2016 #22

I hope so too mcar Feb 2016 #23

Get rid of the vauge "community standard", as a first step, and bring back still_one Feb 2016 #36

Total site-wide moderation might be impractical ... but ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #40

good suggestions. I still think community standards is not a good criteria for jury ruling still_one Feb 2016 #41

That's ridiculous. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #25

Vindictive and vicious alerting. JohnnyLib2 Feb 2016 #26

They're literally alerting everything Codeine Feb 2016 #27

+1 Starry Messenger Feb 2016 #31

For real. They tried to get me today, too. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #35

"She is sexist and hurt my feelings" ??? Seriously?? NurseJackie Feb 2016 #37

I know, right? I didn't know that Camille Paglia posted here PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #39

hahaha obamanut2012 Feb 2016 #43

I have to imagine this is a disruptor aping the BS folks jsmirman Feb 2016 #44

I stand with LeftofCool Gothmog Feb 2016 #29

+++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Feb 2016 #38

I rec'd it anyway DemonGoddess Feb 2016 #45

Shameful hide. Bleacher Creature Feb 2016 #46