Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bernie 2016 Returns Donations to Remedy Campaign Finance Issues [View all]
https://gobling.wordpress.com/2016/03/22/bernie-2016-returns-donations-to-remedy-campaign-finance-issues/Over 200 contributors to the Bernie Sanders campaign will have their money refunded as a result of irregularities with its campaign fund-raising committee during 2015. The refunds are detailed in a response to the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) sent by Susan Jackson, Treasurer of Bernie 2016 and dated March 17, 2016. Jackson was answering a FEC notice regarding the 2015 Year End Report of Bernie 2015.
See FEC Finds $23 Million Unitemized Contributions in Bernie 2016 PAC for details on the FEC notice.
In her electronically-filed response, Jackson covers the ten items noted in the FEC letter, including $23 million in unitemized contributions, various accounting discrepancies, excessive campaign contributions and prohibited donations from Foreign Nationals.
The response by Susan Jackson can be accessed at this page on the FEC website under View Miscellaneous Document.
Jackson stated that the excess portion of each contribution has been refunded for over 100 contributors who were allowed to donate over the limits of campaign law. Each contributors name and the amount returned is itemized. These amounts range from a few dollars to several hundred to highs of over $2000 each.
The issue of prohibited contributions from foreign nationals was not entirely resolved. While Jackson listed a number as verified U.S. Citizens or Permanent Resident Aliens, another 106 contributors were not verified. The Bernie 2016 committee has returned these donations as well, although refund amounts will not be itemized until its April 2016 report to the FEC.
Jackson noted that amended reports would be supplied to remedy campaign finance problems in a number of other areas.
As for the $23 million in Unitemized Contributions spotted by the FEC , Jackson responded with this brief statement:
Regarding the un-itemized receipts listed on Line 17(a)(ii) of the Detailed Summary Page, the Committee hereby confirms that the aggregate total for the election cycle for each un-itemized contribution included in the Line 17(a)(ii) total is under the applicable $200 threshold.
The returned contributions will have some impact on the Bernie Sanders campaign, which spent heavily on operations as it closed out 2015. Its $96 million in receipts was reduced to just $14 million at the start of February 2016.
The fund-raising committee is also facing another round of possible refunds from its January 2016 report. The FEC found similar irregularities with unitemized receipts and donations from Foreign Nationals.
See FEC Finds $23 Million Unitemized Contributions in Bernie 2016 PAC for details on the FEC notice.
In her electronically-filed response, Jackson covers the ten items noted in the FEC letter, including $23 million in unitemized contributions, various accounting discrepancies, excessive campaign contributions and prohibited donations from Foreign Nationals.
The response by Susan Jackson can be accessed at this page on the FEC website under View Miscellaneous Document.
Jackson stated that the excess portion of each contribution has been refunded for over 100 contributors who were allowed to donate over the limits of campaign law. Each contributors name and the amount returned is itemized. These amounts range from a few dollars to several hundred to highs of over $2000 each.
The issue of prohibited contributions from foreign nationals was not entirely resolved. While Jackson listed a number as verified U.S. Citizens or Permanent Resident Aliens, another 106 contributors were not verified. The Bernie 2016 committee has returned these donations as well, although refund amounts will not be itemized until its April 2016 report to the FEC.
Jackson noted that amended reports would be supplied to remedy campaign finance problems in a number of other areas.
As for the $23 million in Unitemized Contributions spotted by the FEC , Jackson responded with this brief statement:
Regarding the un-itemized receipts listed on Line 17(a)(ii) of the Detailed Summary Page, the Committee hereby confirms that the aggregate total for the election cycle for each un-itemized contribution included in the Line 17(a)(ii) total is under the applicable $200 threshold.
The returned contributions will have some impact on the Bernie Sanders campaign, which spent heavily on operations as it closed out 2015. Its $96 million in receipts was reduced to just $14 million at the start of February 2016.
The fund-raising committee is also facing another round of possible refunds from its January 2016 report. The FEC found similar irregularities with unitemized receipts and donations from Foreign Nationals.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He may not be spending money on his wardrobe but he's sure keeping it for himself.
calimary
Mar 2016
#12
Well, that kills the myth of $27 dollar donations from donors, doesn't it? And they're facing
BlueCaliDem
Mar 2016
#3
The best thing about Tad Devine is that his name is funny in almost every situation!
Walk away
Mar 2016
#42
Explains why his BFFs on MSNBC threw him a bernie love fest marathon last night.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2016
#8
It's not like that represents a few errors or a small percentage of the money they've collected.....
George II
Mar 2016
#20
I think it's deliciously ironic that the folks who claim to be campaign reformists are the ones who
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2016
#29
It's positively Karmic. So how come no other campaign has this big a mess?
misterhighwasted
Mar 2016
#33
"So how come no other campaign has this big a mess?" That is an excellent question, and one that...
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2016
#39
Guess he won't be doing anymore town halls/debates till this blows over.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2016
#53
Yup. laying low. If he loses Az & Utah, his donations are going to nosedive
misterhighwasted
Mar 2016
#61