Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

spooky3

(38,546 posts)

19. I respectfully disagree, but it doesn't change the BS problem.

Reply to SharonClark (Reply #17)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 07:57 PM

Apr 2016

Unless they have a very complex situation, which they may have, packages like TurboTax automate so much that people with computer skills can do them.

But either way, there is no excuse for not disclosing them. If he wants to say he considers them private, he should say that. But if he wants credit for being open and honest, and he implies that HRC is hiding something bad by not disclosing private info about speeches, then he needs to get the info out there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders' tax release claim rated as a "Whopper" by WaPo Fact Checker [View all] Rose Siding Apr 2016 OP

4 Pinocchios.. it was 3 last time.. Cha Apr 2016 #1

I guess he's getting the media attention he wanted mcar Apr 2016 #2

He is hiding the tax returns, is he also hiding his money trail from lobbyists? Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #3

Definitely not the media coverage his CNN-protesting flunkies thought they'd get, right? CalvinballPro Apr 2016 #4

And, on msnbc, too.. Chris Hayes.. I'm talking to you.. Cha Apr 2016 #6

VETTING! HA! Her Sister Apr 2016 #5

Sanders is sure racking up the Pinocchios! pandr32 Apr 2016 #7

pants on fire sarae Apr 2016 #21

The faithful devotees cannot see it .. they come up with excuses n/t cosmicone Apr 2016 #8

Oh noes! St Bernard is pure of heart & walks the world in monk's robes! Jane, what have you done.... Hekate Apr 2016 #9

Makes me wonder what he is trying to hide. 4now Apr 2016 #10

KNR Thank you! Lucinda Apr 2016 #11

As I mentioned in a different thread, maybe it's Jane's taxes that are the problem. LisaM Apr 2016 #12

Don't forget that he is on record as being against Charities! Walk away Apr 2016 #13

Well, then it shouldn't matter in his tax returns, because he's already on record. LisaM Apr 2016 #15

Actually, it would, because they claimed $12000 spooky3 Apr 2016 #18

I simply meant that it shouldn't prejudice anyone if he didn't donate to charity LisaM Apr 2016 #20

gotcha! spooky3 Apr 2016 #22

12K? sheshe2 Apr 2016 #24

yes--on another thread there is a link to the (partially redacted) first 2 pp. of their 1040 spooky3 Apr 2016 #25

Agree SharonClark Apr 2016 #17

I respectfully disagree, but it doesn't change the BS problem. spooky3 Apr 2016 #19

I believe in paying experts fairly for their work. LisaM Apr 2016 #26

your pearls are rattling up a storm from being clutched so tight fpublic Apr 2016 #23

This is the Hillary GROUP! sheshe2 Apr 2016 #27

This vetting... wysi Apr 2016 #14

K&R fleabiscuit Apr 2016 #16

K&R! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #28

Did anyone hear any media mention of the tax returns tonight? n/t nygurl Apr 2016 #29