Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 18 April 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)THIS ONE IS FOR YOU, TANSY! I KNOW HOW YOU COLLECT WANKERS...
http://www.eschatonblog.com/2012/04/one-true-wanker-of-decade.html
Friedman possesses all of the qualities that make a pundit truly wankerific. He fetishizes a false "centrism" which is basically whatever Tom Friedman likes, imagining the Friedman agenda is both incredibly popular in the country and lacking any support from our current politicians, when in fact the opposite is usually true. Washington worships at the altar of the agenda of false centrism, and people often hate it. Problems abroad, even ones which really have nothing to do with us, should be solved by war, and problems at home should be solved by increasing the suffering of poor and middle class people. Even though one political party is pretty much implementing, or trying to implement, 99.999999% of the Friedman agenda, what we really need is a third party catering precisely to this silent majority of Friedmanites.
Truly great wankers possess a kind of glib narcissism, the belief that everything is about them while simultaneously disavowing any responsibility for anything. The important thing about an issue is whether it proves Tom Friedman fucking right, but if it doesn't we can just move on to the next big thing that will prove Tom Friedman fucking right. If you advocate for wars that go a bit bad, well, it's not your fault. If only Tom Friedman had been in charge everything would have been great.
Such wankers are impervious to criticism because they're always doing battle with straw critics. They never remember what they said last week, and assume you won't either.
- In April 2003 Friedman said that Arab journalists who talked about the US occupation of Iraq were guilty of Saddamism. In August 2003 Friedman wrote: This is an occupation.
- In 2007 he surmised that Iraqis hate each other more than they love their own kids. In 2009 he hoped that theyd learned from Americas million acts of kindness and profound example of how much people of different backgrounds can accomplish when they work together.
- In 2005 Friedman argued: We have to have a proper election in Iraq so we can have a proper civil war there. Earlier this year, he wrote: For all of the murderous efforts by al-Qaida to trigger a full-scale civil war in Iraq, it never happened. Never mind that in 2006 he said: It is now obvious that we are not midwifing democracy in Iraq. We are baby-sitting a civil war.
Tom Friedman is wrong about everything, and Tom Friedman don't care!
MORE AT LINK