Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

westerebus

(2,978 posts)
6. Would it be possible to include SMW's disclaimer.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 06:32 PM
Dec 2011

That this is for informational and entertainment purposes and not investment advice to paraphrase that tread.

As far as how broad, if it starts with two economists walk into a bar and ends with no animals were injured in the making of this post, exclusive of pictures of naughty bits, what's not part and parcel of the dismal science?

The politics of money and the powers that be are fair game.

And that "truth-e-ness" thing is a welcomed refreshment (given the corporate lacky spew) as a fair test of what the purpose of the economy post group forum whatchamacallit thingy is should anyone ask might cover it. Also know as the duck test.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Question for the group: h...»Reply #6