Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
21. As many others here probably know,
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 04:20 PM
Jan 2012

But I had to look it up, the following is extremely pertinent

from the Federal Reserve website off its own web pages:

Table 1A. Memorandum Items

Table 1A presents selected items that do not directly affect the Federal Reserve's assets and liabilities but are related to important roles that the Federal Reserve plays. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York acts as a custodian in holding securities on behalf of foreign official and international institutions. Market participants often look for trends in these data to gauge foreign demand for U.S. Treasury and agency securities. This table also presents information on the securities lent by the Federal Reserve under its securities lending programs. As noted in more detail in Lending to primary dealers, the Federal Reserve lends securities from its portfolio of Treasury securities and federal agency debt securities to foster efficient and liquid trading in the market for these securities. When securities are lent, they continue to be listed as assets of the Federal Reserve because the Federal Reserve retains ownership of the securities."


So basically we have some semantics here. Many who support everything that happens in this nation, as long as it happens at the behest of someone with a supposed "D" after their name (Though I don't know that Geithner or Bernanke are really Dems) will argue that putting up the Federal Reserve money as securities to the Biggest Banks doesn't count as a loan.

But the fact of the matter is that once the Biggest Banks lose the money they are fond of placing into exotic trades, they will certainly have no reservations about glomming on to those security funds. Of course, with the exception of people like Kucinich, Ron Paul, Grayson and one or two others, no one seems to talk about this out loud. The American middle class is now so firmly entrenched in fear and exhaustion, they no longer can think straight.

So sins that our fathers and mothers' generation would have never let come to pass are continuing.

Get the facts straight - taxpayers aren't paying 750 billion Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #1
Investing 3 trillion and getting 77 billion is not a lot of money. It's less than 3%. mbperrin Jan 2012 #2
That was just for one year, and all expenses are paid out of earnings. Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #4
The 3 trillion figure came from YOUR original link. mbperrin Jan 2012 #7
But that money doesn't come from taxpayers Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #10
I wanted to make another comment on the global problem Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #12
Several things Sam1 Jan 2012 #16
You mean spending is not limited when you have a sovereign currency, not debt, right? Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #18
I ment what I said. Sam1 Jan 2012 #20
Are you aware that the banks are still "borrowing" from the Fed - truedelphi Jan 2012 #8
That's not borrowing from the Fed Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #11
Call it what you want but William Black and Allan Grayson wouldn't truedelphi Jan 2012 #13
First of all, it looks to me, like Sam1 Jan 2012 #17
As many others here probably know, truedelphi Jan 2012 #21
Cherry pick much? westerebus Jan 2012 #19
How do cramdowns and mass bank liquidations fix anything? dkf Jan 2012 #3
You can't make mortgage loans when rates are this low. Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #5
You run into non-warrantable condos? dkf Jan 2012 #6
Condos can be a real mess Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #9
Are condos a small enough % that the real estate market can be fixed without it? dkf Jan 2012 #14
It depends on your area Yo_Mama Jan 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Why not cramdowns instead...»Reply #21