Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH, Wednesday, December 14, 2011 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)9. Why No Financial Crisis Prosecutions? Ex-Justice Official Says It’s Just too Hard By Marian Wang
http://www.nationofchange.org/why-no-financial-crisis-prosecutions-ex-justice-official-says-it-s-just-too-hard-1323357871
...according to a now-departed Justice Department official who used to be in charge of investigating such matters, the Justice Department has decided that holding top Wall Street executives criminally accountable is too difficult a task. David Cardona, who recently left the FBI for a job at the Securities and Exchange Commission, told the Wall Street Journal that bringing financial wrongdoing to account is better left to regulators, who can bring civil cases. Civil cases, of course, can produce penalties from the banks -- as well as promises to be on better behavior -- but dont put any executives behind bars. Heres the Journal:
Cardona told the Journal that the failed first attempt to charge financial players with crisis-related fraud -- the 2009 trial and eventual acquittal of two Bear Stearns Cos. hedge-fund managers -- triggered "a lot of rethinking on how we do things. After that, he said, the federal government began to question its ability to convince a jury that criminality has occurred on complex and technical financial cases.
The lack of prosecutions was also raised in a 60 Minutes piece Sunday about large-scale mortgage fraud during the bubble. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer told CBS that the Justice Department had not lost confidence and was bringing every case that we believe can be made....I get it. I find the excessive risk taking to be offensive, said Breuer. I may personally share the same frustration that American people all over the country are feeling, that in and of itself doesnt mean we bring a criminal case.
However, one question raised by the 60 Minutes segment is why the Justice Department isnt building criminal cases against companies for violating Sarbanes-Oxley -- a landmark corporate reform law enacted after Enron. From the transcript:
As Cardona -- the former Justice official -- sees it, financial regulators have been doing a fine job building civil cases against big firms. That might come as a surprise to U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, whos repeatedly rebuked the SEC for striking relatively small agreements to settle civil charges against financial firms. As we noted last week, Rakoff tore into a recent $285 million settlement with Citigroup, calling the financial penalty pocket change for Citi and blasting the SECs longstanding practice of allowing firms to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
...according to a now-departed Justice Department official who used to be in charge of investigating such matters, the Justice Department has decided that holding top Wall Street executives criminally accountable is too difficult a task. David Cardona, who recently left the FBI for a job at the Securities and Exchange Commission, told the Wall Street Journal that bringing financial wrongdoing to account is better left to regulators, who can bring civil cases. Civil cases, of course, can produce penalties from the banks -- as well as promises to be on better behavior -- but dont put any executives behind bars. Heres the Journal:
While at the FBI, Mr. Cardona oversaw dozens of criminal probes of large financial firms. The FBI's probes haven't led to any successful prosecutions of high-profile executives in relation to the financial crisis, despite demands from some lawmakers and angry Americans. In contrast, the SEC has filed crisis-related civil-fraud cases against 81 firms and individuals, and it has negotiated almost $2 billion in penalties in cases that have been settled.
Cardona told the Journal that the failed first attempt to charge financial players with crisis-related fraud -- the 2009 trial and eventual acquittal of two Bear Stearns Cos. hedge-fund managers -- triggered "a lot of rethinking on how we do things. After that, he said, the federal government began to question its ability to convince a jury that criminality has occurred on complex and technical financial cases.
The lack of prosecutions was also raised in a 60 Minutes piece Sunday about large-scale mortgage fraud during the bubble. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer told CBS that the Justice Department had not lost confidence and was bringing every case that we believe can be made....I get it. I find the excessive risk taking to be offensive, said Breuer. I may personally share the same frustration that American people all over the country are feeling, that in and of itself doesnt mean we bring a criminal case.
However, one question raised by the 60 Minutes segment is why the Justice Department isnt building criminal cases against companies for violating Sarbanes-Oxley -- a landmark corporate reform law enacted after Enron. From the transcript:
The Sarbanes Oxley Act imposed strict rules for corporate governance, requiring chief executive officers and chief financial officers to certify under oath that their financial statements are accurate and that they have established an effective set of internal controls to insure that all relevant information reaches investors. Knowingly signing a false statement is a criminal offense punishable with up to five years in prison.
Frank Partnoy is a highly regarded securities lawyer, a professor at the University of San Diego Law School and an expert on Sarbanes Oxley.
Frank Partnoy: The idea was to have a criminal statute in place that would make CEOs and CFOs think twice, think three times before they signed their names attesting to the accuracy of financial statements or the viability of internal controls.
Kroft: And this law has not been used at all in the financial crisis.
Partnoy: It hasn't been used to go after Wall Street. It hasn't been used for these kinds of cases at all.
Kroft: Why not?
Partnoy: I don't know.
Frank Partnoy is a highly regarded securities lawyer, a professor at the University of San Diego Law School and an expert on Sarbanes Oxley.
Frank Partnoy: The idea was to have a criminal statute in place that would make CEOs and CFOs think twice, think three times before they signed their names attesting to the accuracy of financial statements or the viability of internal controls.
Kroft: And this law has not been used at all in the financial crisis.
Partnoy: It hasn't been used to go after Wall Street. It hasn't been used for these kinds of cases at all.
Kroft: Why not?
Partnoy: I don't know.
As Cardona -- the former Justice official -- sees it, financial regulators have been doing a fine job building civil cases against big firms. That might come as a surprise to U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, whos repeatedly rebuked the SEC for striking relatively small agreements to settle civil charges against financial firms. As we noted last week, Rakoff tore into a recent $285 million settlement with Citigroup, calling the financial penalty pocket change for Citi and blasting the SECs longstanding practice of allowing firms to settle without admitting wrongdoing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Management Gurus Claim They were Blindsided by Toxic Culture at Countrywide By Michael Hudson
Demeter
Dec 2011
#7
Why No Financial Crisis Prosecutions? Ex-Justice Official Says It’s Just too Hard By Marian Wang
Demeter
Dec 2011
#9
Notice How Subtly TIME Smears Occupation Movement with the Image of a Masked "Terrorist"
Demeter
Dec 2011
#36
Plus the not so subtle woman wearing a hajib lower in the scarf design of the main pic.
dixiegrrrrl
Dec 2011
#88
Secretive Millionaires Funding Online Primary For 'Independent' White House Run
Demeter
Dec 2011
#32
Stiglitz: US must invest massively in infrastructure, technology, and education
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#72
Detainment Camps Going Live: FEMA Seeking Subcontractors “Temporary Camp Services” In All 50 States
Demeter
Dec 2011
#69
"...across the entire United States..." What does it mean? Evenly distributed throughout all States
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#100
Why Is Eric Cantor Blocking the Congressional Insider Trading Act? By John Carney
Demeter
Dec 2011
#79
Last Week Americans Pulled The Most Money From Stock Market Since US Downgrade, Despite Market Surge
Demeter
Dec 2011
#80
Former Financial Advisor Gets 20 Years For Bilking Widows, Holocaust Survivors
Demeter
Dec 2011
#114