Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. If you want to claim a threat, do the math.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:08 PM
Apr 2012

Tons of radiated water dumped into the Pacific sounds enormous. We're all gonna die!!!

Except the pacific is 64.1 million square miles with an average depth of 2.7 miles (source). Meaning it's about 170 million cubic miles of water.

At 32 degrees F, water weighs 62.42lbs per cubic foot (And I'm using 32 degrees for convenience - I don't know the average temperature of the Pacific, but it doesn't change much within reasonable ocean temperatures - 62lbs per cubic foot at 100 degrees F).

So...The Pacific weighs about 780,000,000,000,000,000 (7.8 x 10^17) tons.

Let's say they dumped 100 tons of water into the ocean. That's a lot of water. But it's 0.00000000000128% (1.28 x 10^-14 percent) of the Pacific Ocean.

Suddenly, claims that that water is going to poison the entire Pacific seem significantly less plausible.

No one else can help Japan? Like Japan knows what they are doing even tho after a year has gone by and there is still a HUGE problem?

Uh-huh. Just how long should this cleanup take? I mean, you yourself must be some sort of expert since you know exactly how long the cleanup should take.

Oh wait, you're just spewing fear without even bothering to break out a calculator, much less showing any expertise.

So...how long did it take to clean up Chernobyl? Oh wait...they're not done yet. So you expect Fukushima be cleaned up in a year, when it's been 26 years since Chernobyl and they're not done.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

thank you Senator Wyden n/t grasswire Apr 2012 #1
all the pro-nuclear folks should pay a visit Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #2
Creativity really isn't the problem. kristopher Apr 2012 #7
I guess what I meant is that the people in power Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #10
I really don't understand . . . Richard D Apr 2012 #3
So true. Maybe they are minimizing the raouldukelives Apr 2012 #6
Because as per Rachel Maddow last week... Javaman Apr 2012 #8
Thats the part that sticks in my crawl madokie Apr 2012 #11
Like the unsinkable Titanic? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #13
It was their arrogance that did us all in... Javaman Apr 2012 #19
Because it's not a threat to the world jeff47 Apr 2012 #9
We have us ANOTHER expert, eh? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #12
If you want to claim a threat, do the math. jeff47 Apr 2012 #14
wow RobertEarl Apr 2012 #15
Detecting a molecule is easy. Getting harmed by it, not so much. jeff47 Apr 2012 #16
wow again RobertEarl Apr 2012 #17
So kids and especially female kids live in lead-lined safes? jeff47 Apr 2012 #22
I know you Javaman Apr 2012 #23
Feel free to cite any incorrect fact. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2012 #40
Wrong again. FBaggins Apr 2012 #24
Oh? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #26
Yes. FBaggins Apr 2012 #27
So robots will save us all! Javaman Apr 2012 #20
You are aware that people invent new stuff, right? jeff47 Apr 2012 #21
robots are going to save us all!!! Javaman Apr 2012 #38
Well, considering your claim is we have to abandon Japan for the next few hundred years jeff47 Apr 2012 #39
Where did I say that? Javaman Apr 2012 #41
More.... abelenkpe Apr 2012 #4
Big technical hurdle to be overcome RobertEarl Apr 2012 #18
Well... it looks like you spelled that correctly FBaggins Apr 2012 #25
Guess this is news to you? RobertEarl Apr 2012 #28
It would be news to anyone FBaggins Apr 2012 #29
it was dumb RobertEarl Apr 2012 #30
You're really pro-nuke, aren't you? FBaggins Apr 2012 #31
What.... RobertEarl Apr 2012 #32
Thanks for making it so easy. FBaggins Apr 2012 #33
that is sad, FBaggins RobertEarl Apr 2012 #34
Lol... I've only give you facts. FBaggins Apr 2012 #35
Your one fact RobertEarl Apr 2012 #36
Claiming it's "asinine" just puts your own ignorance on display. FBaggins Apr 2012 #37
Check this JEB Apr 2012 #5
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Senator Wyden: Fukushima ...»Reply #14