Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

David__77

(24,820 posts)
3. OK...
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:13 PM
May 2012
http://cgec.ucdavis.edu/ACEEE/1994-96/1996/VOL06/163.PDF

This paper shows that the bin method of estimating energy savings results in wildly inaccurate savings estimates, when checked against properly calibrated energy simulations of the same projects. While this paper shows the inaccuracy being both high and low, in my practice, I see more overestimation. That is because the analyst can tweak things or make methodological errors that would lead to a higher estimate and therefore a more attractive product from the customer perspective.

A problem in practice is that the system operator may override the energy savings settings, reducing system savings. There are all kinds of things that can go wrong, but the "clean" bin method does not account for this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Energy Management Systems...»Reply #3