Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,735 posts)
11. That would be a fossil fueled or nuclear kilowatt hours?
Mon May 5, 2014, 06:15 PM
May 2014

A solar or wind desalinization plant is expensive. Either the plant only works when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing, or else you have to add the cost of storage schemes to the total cost of the system.

For irrigation in arid climates that's very expensive water even at 4 to 8 cents kwh. Farmers in the U.S.A. would typically measure their water use in acre feet. An acre foot is 325,851 US gallons.

A golf course in Southern California might use 400-800 acre feet of water annually. Is it really a good idea to build a fossil-fueled desalinization plant to support uses like that?





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Desalination around the w...»Reply #11