Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
16. Comprehension problem
Fri May 9, 2014, 12:13 PM
May 2014
Your first example uses up metallic scrub pads as an fuel source. You already got smacked down on that absurd idea of an "economical" source of hydrogen here:

From the thread:
mpsp (miles per scrub pad) is not the point
I'm not advocating creating hydrogen with aluminum or pot scrubbers.
The point of that post was to show that creating hydrogen gas does not require millions of dollars of equipment.

Any "smacking down" was imagined, by those who didn't understand the words in that thread.

It would be far, far more economical and energy-efficient to buy an electric car that could charge directly from those solar panels

Experts disagree

Better Than a Battery

'Since they're basically electric, it begs the question: Why not just drive a battery-electric vehicle? Ronald Grasman, general manager of U.S. fuel cell vehicle operations with Mercedes-Benz, explained the problems with EVs during the conference. "Battery vehicles are great," he said, "but they have their limitations when it comes to range and charging time. This is where fuel cell vehicles make a great difference."

In theory, a hydrogen car can beat a battery electric thanks to convenient and quick refueling, and a somewhat esoteric concept called "energy density." An EV requires long recharging times, and even with a big battery, the range of an EV is usually limited to 100 miles or so. However, hydrogen can be pumped into a tank similar to gasoline, and that tank full of hydrogen holds a lot more energy than a battery does. The upshot is that you can get zero emissions, the rough equivalent of gasoline-car range, but without the long wait of recharging, or the hassle of engineering a gigantic battery pack into the vehicle.
http://www.kbb.com/car-news/all-the-latest/hydrogen-cars-close-to-reality/2000010655/



http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/10001_well_to_wheels_gge_petroleum_use.pdf



Batteries or Fuel Cells?
http://cleancaroptions.com/html/batteries_or_fuel_cells-.html


Different fuels have different levels of energy content and the above graph relates to energy released through combustion. The higher the energy content the higher the quality of the fuel, which is inversely proportional to its chemical complexity. High quality fuels are gases while low quality fuels are solids, with liquids in between...
https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch8en/conc8en/energycontent.html


battery only EV's lose up to 57% of their range in cold weather, and what happens to all these batteries that will sooner or later need to be replaced? And driving around 1,000 pounds of batteries costs how much efficiency?

Here's an answer to getting off oil, becoming energy self sufficient and doing this in an environmentally friendly way. And then some people say maybe we don't even need cars. Astounding.

The future is here and no amount of denial is going to change it.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well this will get squashed quickly. CFLDem Apr 2014 #1
I expect that soon we will have a "minimum electricity charge" for everyone, no matter djean111 Apr 2014 #2
Really, they're no doubt working on who owns the sun. toby jo Apr 2014 #3
according to the article Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #5
according to the article The CCC Apr 2014 #6
Independent? You still have to buy hydrogen NickB79 Apr 2014 #8
no, you don't nationalize the fed May 2014 #13
Again, none of that is free. You are still paying to make the hydrogen NickB79 May 2014 #14
Comprehension problem nationalize the fed May 2014 #16
Top Gear: The Car Tech for the Future nationalize the fed Apr 2014 #4
look at this video rafeh1 Apr 2014 #7
Toyota fires bullets into hydrogen fuel tanks nationalize the fed Apr 2014 #9
The Geography of Transport Systems nationalize the fed Apr 2014 #10
Shoot a Hydrogen tank, Gas & Propane Tanks nationalize the fed Apr 2014 #11
kick nationalize the fed May 2014 #12
First question: Do we need cars? hunter May 2014 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Toyota's new Hydrogen Fue...»Reply #16