Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
18. Psychology is a real stumbling block in group dynamics
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:07 PM
Aug 2015

Groups are prone to status/dominance competitions that result in the emergence of cliques and leaders. Such competitions are virtually a defining characteristic of organized groups. Being part of the leading clique is usually so attractive that people will self-censor any differences of opinion in order to ensure their membership. This happens all the time in real life, in boardrooms and meeting halls everywhere. I've seen it play out in almost every on-line forum or blog I've participated it, including The Oil Drum, Nature Bats Last, Facebook groups and DU boards. It's the reason for the echo-chamber effect and groupthink.

It's especially active in politics, and is a (the?) major obstacle to proactive decision-making on big issues like climate change. Interdisciplinary groups may be the toughest, because each member gives primacy to the discipline(s) they are most secure in and derogates other perspectives - the bun-fights can be breathtaking.

Because the primary reward in this competition is status, and the competition is reinforced by the neurotransmitter dopamine, it's very difficult indeed to prevent. It's a main reason why I tend not to belong to many such groups.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"worst-case thinking" bias (AKA “doomer” bias) OKIsItJustMe Aug 2015 #1
Yes, the same bias is part of my lowball estimate of our sustainability. GliderGuider Aug 2015 #2
I'm lightening up a bit on my position regarding sustainable population levels GliderGuider Aug 2015 #11
“I characterize my lowball estimates as one end of a probability distribution curve.” OKIsItJustMe Aug 2015 #12
Yep. Conditions change, and our knowledge of the factors involved do as well. GliderGuider Aug 2015 #13
“That goes for people too.” OKIsItJustMe Aug 2015 #14
Why haven’t we had a “World War” recently? GliderGuider Aug 2015 #15
World Wars strike me as “group” activities OKIsItJustMe Aug 2015 #17
Apology accepted. bananas Aug 2015 #3
You're most welcome. GliderGuider Aug 2015 #4
Very mature position FBaggins Aug 2015 #6
"Peak Oil" was the optimistic view. That filthy stuff is destroying the world. hunter Aug 2015 #5
I think this post, plus the OP, plus one of GG's former posts... FBaggins Aug 2015 #7
To be clear, my point is not that PO theory was wrong (that's a different discussion) GliderGuider Aug 2015 #8
Peak Oil seemed to be a type of psychological operation Fast Walker 52 Aug 2015 #9
Peak oil has two huge problems, that generally are ignored till it is to late. happyslug Aug 2015 #10
Excellent post. It's a complex problem. Yo_Mama Aug 2015 #16
Psychology is a real stumbling block in group dynamics GliderGuider Aug 2015 #18
I’m going to go with “A major obstacle.” OKIsItJustMe Aug 2015 #19
I think the bandwagon underestimated the establishment psychology cprise Aug 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Death of Peak Oil (at...»Reply #18