In Bay Area, candid Israeli historian Benny Morris sounds off on genocide and politics

[aranthus]

22. I figured you wouldn't answer the question, but I wanted to give you a chance.

You know your posts far better than I could, and I'm not going to waste my time searching through them for something that probably isn't there. I asked a very specific question that I don't remember you ever having answered. What is the practical difference between your version of post-zionism and anti-zionism? Your cite doesn't answer that question. It does point out one of the problems with post-zionism. Post-zionism falsely describes zionism as a movement. While there is a Zionist movement, zionism is an idea. Specifically it is the idea that there should be a Jewish majority state in all or some of ancient Israel. Now the creation of modern Israel may mean that the Zionist movement has achieved its goal, but the idea remains. So the premise of post-zionism is false.

None of which even begins to answer my question as to your position about the end result of your beliefs. Again, it appears that your end result is a Palestinian Arab majority state in Israel/West Bank/Gaza. Yes or no?