Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT

(3,310 posts)

17. I missed that!

Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:51 PM

Jun 2013

Now that is a way-mo-bigga thing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOMA had no severability clause! [View all] Pab Sungenis Jun 2013 OP

+1 pinto Jun 2013 #1

Yep, and later on it specifically states Pab Sungenis Jun 2013 #10

I missed that! HillWilliam Jun 2013 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #13

Kick! MotherPetrie Jun 2013 #4

Interesting customerserviceguy Jun 2013 #5

K&R Sherman A1 Jun 2013 #6

Unfortunately - Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #7

But without severability Pab Sungenis Jun 2013 #9

Not necessarily. Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #11

Maybe I'm not getting this right, but... last1standing Jun 2013 #8

Intermediate scrutiny. n/t Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #12

Fair enough. last1standing Jun 2013 #14

The really important thing is that they did NOT use rational basis. Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #15

I bet they'll let that slide MNBrewer Jun 2013 #16