Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chemisse

(31,350 posts)
24. I don't mean to give you a hard time and I appreciate your response.
Fri Dec 23, 2011, 10:03 AM
Dec 2011

You might want to consider posting in a more user-friendly way, and in a way that doesn't seem like a sales pitch, and you may get more interesting discussions going.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I didn't read through all of the content EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #1
Sure you understand. It's in my sig. The absence of key energy producing/converting enzymes, HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #3
Are you saying rockets are more complicated than the humans? HuckleB Dec 2011 #5
In a way yes... they are much harder to fly for one thing...on the other hand, key energy HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #8
That's quite the convoluted answer, followed by a classic red herring. HuckleB Dec 2011 #9
When you have read the Toxic Metal Syndrome, The Coenzyme Q10 Phenomenon, The Lipoic Acid HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #12
In other words, you believe those who choose to push selected preliminary studies as evidence ... HuckleB Dec 2011 #23
Correlation and Causation trotsky Dec 2011 #10
So it's your goal to get as many people as possible to buy supplements? laconicsax Dec 2011 #6
Goal is to reduce the ridiculous, lower healthcare costs, improve the quality of life for those who HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #13
Well, by making posts with an unrelated subject and message, you're certainly doing something... laconicsax Dec 2011 #19
Your sig promotes someone who appears to be a cholesterol denialist who also rails against vaccines. HuckleB Dec 2011 #11
Rails against vaccines?? I call bullshit.... that is slander in the third degree. I think I'll send HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #16
Thank you for proving my point. HuckleB Dec 2011 #21
+1,000,000,000,000 HuckleB Dec 2011 #4
How do either of those studies have anything to do with your subject? kdmorris Dec 2011 #2
Read the conclusions, the answers are there. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #17
No, they are not kdmorris Dec 2011 #20
I don't get it. Chemisse Dec 2011 #7
I am pushing so that someone somewhere will do something that gets it prescribed to patients HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #14
I think you need to understand the effect your posts have EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #18
People who work on the medical field know exactly what this stuff means. n'/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #28
And? EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #29
Well, the idea is to present some medical language in the hopes of supporting MineralMan Dec 2011 #30
The audience which consists of about 4 people it would seem, can read a conclusion indicating HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #34
I don't mean to give you a hard time and I appreciate your response. Chemisse Dec 2011 #24
If you read my sig and realize that Dr. Sinatra is a cardiologist of probably 40 years or better it HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #15
Thank you for offering another logical fallacy. HuckleB Dec 2011 #22
Tis the season to not see you, fa la la la la I don't see you. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #27
You must be referring to the Ignore feature. MineralMan Dec 2011 #31
I'm referring to the little strips of sticky notes I have cut and placed on my monitor wherever HB HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #32
Try this: laconicsax Dec 2011 #33
And what will I do with these 300 or so strips of paper?? Here is a conclusion that HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #35
You could grind them up and sell them as supplements. laconicsax Dec 2011 #37
Interesting that you would go there, when this is about helping people find a HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #38
You may find this link interesting: laconicsax Dec 2011 #39
Nope.... you may find this interesting... and realize that the supplements used are the HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #40
9 out of 32! laconicsax Dec 2011 #42
Heh heh heh heh heh heh heh. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #43
Thats PROOF! Dammit. PROOF! MineralMan Dec 2011 #45
72% didn't respond to treatment! What more could you ask for to show that PycnoQ10 works ? laconicsax Dec 2011 #46
Well, natch! MineralMan Dec 2011 #47
Have you been told that elevated homocysteine levels are a good indicator HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #36
Have you been told that assumptions are a poor way to discuss matters of health? HuckleB Dec 2011 #48
Do you realize that you don't know a thing about the topic at hand? Also you are unwilling to even HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #52
How would you know what I know? HuckleB Dec 2011 #55
Unfortunately, I can't take any doctor at face value kdmorris Dec 2011 #25
Dr. Sinatra is also a web merchant, selling products MineralMan Dec 2011 #26
How conveniently you ignore the printed page right in front of your face. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #41
I ignore nothing. I did a pretty thorough look at Dr. Sinatra's supplement sales site. MineralMan Dec 2011 #44
Here is the difference in simple layman's terms. HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #49
What are the n values on those studies, 12? laconicsax Dec 2011 #50
Let's see if your math is strong. Say you have 9 people who benefit from a non toxic HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #51
And 73% get no benefit! laconicsax Dec 2011 #53
That study was too small to produce any meaningful data. MineralMan Dec 2011 #54
What makes you think I need things put in "simple, laymen's terms?" MineralMan Dec 2011 #56
The poster in question EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #57
So I understand. Thanks for letting me know. MineralMan Dec 2011 #58
Sorry but anyone who writes on his board something so ridiculous as: LeftishBrit Dec 2011 #59
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Reversing disease by read...»Reply #24