Health

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)

37. You could grind them up and sell them as supplements.

Reply to HysteryDiagnosis (Reply #35)

Fri Dec 23, 2011, 05:01 PM

Dec 2011

The FDA can't regulate you there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Reversing disease by reading random postings on a message board. [View all] HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 OP

I didn't read through all of the content EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #1

Sure you understand. It's in my sig. The absence of key energy producing/converting enzymes, HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #3

Are you saying rockets are more complicated than the humans? HuckleB Dec 2011 #5

In a way yes... they are much harder to fly for one thing...on the other hand, key energy HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #8

That's quite the convoluted answer, followed by a classic red herring. HuckleB Dec 2011 #9

When you have read the Toxic Metal Syndrome, The Coenzyme Q10 Phenomenon, The Lipoic Acid HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #12

In other words, you believe those who choose to push selected preliminary studies as evidence ... HuckleB Dec 2011 #23

Correlation and Causation trotsky Dec 2011 #10

So it's your goal to get as many people as possible to buy supplements? laconicsax Dec 2011 #6

Goal is to reduce the ridiculous, lower healthcare costs, improve the quality of life for those who HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #13

Well, by making posts with an unrelated subject and message, you're certainly doing something... laconicsax Dec 2011 #19

Your sig promotes someone who appears to be a cholesterol denialist who also rails against vaccines. HuckleB Dec 2011 #11

Rails against vaccines?? I call bullshit.... that is slander in the third degree. I think I'll send HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #16

Thank you for proving my point. HuckleB Dec 2011 #21

+1,000,000,000,000 HuckleB Dec 2011 #4

How do either of those studies have anything to do with your subject? kdmorris Dec 2011 #2

Read the conclusions, the answers are there. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #17

No, they are not kdmorris Dec 2011 #20

I don't get it. Chemisse Dec 2011 #7

I am pushing so that someone somewhere will do something that gets it prescribed to patients HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #14

I think you need to understand the effect your posts have EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #18

People who work on the medical field know exactly what this stuff means. n'/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #28

And? EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #29

Well, the idea is to present some medical language in the hopes of supporting MineralMan Dec 2011 #30

The audience which consists of about 4 people it would seem, can read a conclusion indicating HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #34

I don't mean to give you a hard time and I appreciate your response. Chemisse Dec 2011 #24

If you read my sig and realize that Dr. Sinatra is a cardiologist of probably 40 years or better it HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #15

Thank you for offering another logical fallacy. HuckleB Dec 2011 #22

Tis the season to not see you, fa la la la la I don't see you. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #27

You must be referring to the Ignore feature. MineralMan Dec 2011 #31

I'm referring to the little strips of sticky notes I have cut and placed on my monitor wherever HB HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #32

Try this: laconicsax Dec 2011 #33

And what will I do with these 300 or so strips of paper?? Here is a conclusion that HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #35

You could grind them up and sell them as supplements. laconicsax Dec 2011 #37

Interesting that you would go there, when this is about helping people find a HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #38

You may find this link interesting: laconicsax Dec 2011 #39

Nope.... you may find this interesting... and realize that the supplements used are the HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #40

9 out of 32! laconicsax Dec 2011 #42

Heh heh heh heh heh heh heh. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #43

Thats PROOF! Dammit. PROOF! MineralMan Dec 2011 #45

72% didn't respond to treatment! What more could you ask for to show that PycnoQ10 works ? laconicsax Dec 2011 #46

Well, natch! MineralMan Dec 2011 #47

Have you been told that elevated homocysteine levels are a good indicator HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #36

Have you been told that assumptions are a poor way to discuss matters of health? HuckleB Dec 2011 #48

Do you realize that you don't know a thing about the topic at hand? Also you are unwilling to even HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #52

How would you know what I know? HuckleB Dec 2011 #55

Unfortunately, I can't take any doctor at face value kdmorris Dec 2011 #25

Dr. Sinatra is also a web merchant, selling products MineralMan Dec 2011 #26

How conveniently you ignore the printed page right in front of your face. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #41

I ignore nothing. I did a pretty thorough look at Dr. Sinatra's supplement sales site. MineralMan Dec 2011 #44

Here is the difference in simple layman's terms. HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #49

What are the n values on those studies, 12? laconicsax Dec 2011 #50

Let's see if your math is strong. Say you have 9 people who benefit from a non toxic HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #51

And 73% get no benefit! laconicsax Dec 2011 #53

That study was too small to produce any meaningful data. MineralMan Dec 2011 #54

What makes you think I need things put in "simple, laymen's terms?" MineralMan Dec 2011 #56

The poster in question EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #57

So I understand. Thanks for letting me know. MineralMan Dec 2011 #58

Sorry but anyone who writes on his board something so ridiculous as: LeftishBrit Dec 2011 #59