Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HysteryDiagnosis

(19,342 posts)
49. Here is the difference in simple layman's terms.
Fri Dec 23, 2011, 07:06 PM
Dec 2011

NO SIDE EFFECTS, an increase in ejection fraction in CHF patients, Protection of renal tissue in Type II diabetes, etc etc. First, he is DUing NO HARM.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22120862

Statin intolerance: Now a solved problem.
Sikka P, Kapoor S, Bindra VK, Sharma M, Vishwakarma P, Saxena KK.
Source

Department of Pharmacology, LLRM Medical College, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, India.
Abstract

Statins are the most effective and widely used drugs for treating dyslipidemia, a major risk factor for coronary heart disease. These are one of the safest hypolipidemic drugs but many patients are bound to discontinue statins due to their side effects. Hepatotoxicity, myotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy are important out of them. Discontinuation of statins leads to dylipidemia and its grave consequences. Hence, there should be enough strategies for statin intolerant patients, so that they can be saved from these consequences.

These side effects can be avoided by the awareness of certain factors viz. potential drug interactions and dose adjustment according to patho-physiology of the patient. Baseline investigations for liver function and muscle toxicity should be done before initiating statin therapy. Here, we are discussing various options for statin intolerant hyperlipidemic patients such as lower and intermittent dosing of statins, alternate hypolipidemic drugs, red yeast rice, supplementation with coenzyme Q10 and vitamin D. A number of hypolipidemic drugs are in trial phases and hold promise for statin intolerant patients.

ASK yourself what this says EXACTLY:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20367194
TAKE HOME MESSAGE:

CoQ(10) does not cause serious adverse effects in humans and new formulations have been developed that increase CoQ(10) absorption. Oral CoQ(10) is a viable antioxidant strategy in many diseases, providing a significant to mild symptomatic benefit. Idebenone and MitoQ are promising substitutive CoQ(10)-related drugs which are well tolerated and safe.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19932599
In the field of mitochondrial myopathies, primary CoQ(10) deficiencies have been identified, involving different genes of the CoQ(10) biosynthetic pathway; some of these conditions were found to be highly responsive to CoQ(10) administration. The initial observations of CoQ(10) effects in Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases have been extended to Friedreich's ataxia, where CoQ(10) and other quinones have been tested. CoQ(10) is presently being used in a large phase III trial in Parkinson's disease. CoQ(10) has been found to improve sperm count and motility on asthenozoospermia. Moreover, for the first time CoQ(10) was found to decrease the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnancy. The ability of CoQ(10) to mitigate headache symptoms in adults was also verified in pediatric and adolescent populations.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21878067
Abstract

We studied effect of coenzyme Q(10) on 24-hour blood pressure profile and function of vascular endothelium in patients with essential hypertension. Coenzyme Q(10) was used as a component of combination therapy comprising angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. Administration of coenzyme Q(10) in combination with traditional antihypertensive therapy promoted normalization of vascular endothelial function and more effective correction of 24-hour blood pressure profile. These findings allow to consider the use of coenzyme Q(10) as promising component of combination therapy of arterial hypertension.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22172526
Diabetes-induced increases in total renal collagen but not glomerulosclerosis were significantly decreased with CoQ10 therapy. Mitochondrial superoxide and ATP production via complex II in the renal cortex were increased in db/db mice, with ATP normalized by CoQ10. However, excess renal mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide production and increased mitochondrial membrane potential seen in db/db mice were attenuated with CoQ10. Renal superoxide dismutase activity was also lower in db/db mice compared with dbH mice. Our results suggest that a deficiency in mitochondrial oxidized CoQ10 (ubiquinone) may be a likely precipitating factor for diabetic nephropathy. Therefore CoQ10 supplementation may be renoprotective in type 2 diabetes, via preservation of mitochondrial function.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I didn't read through all of the content EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #1
Sure you understand. It's in my sig. The absence of key energy producing/converting enzymes, HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #3
Are you saying rockets are more complicated than the humans? HuckleB Dec 2011 #5
In a way yes... they are much harder to fly for one thing...on the other hand, key energy HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #8
That's quite the convoluted answer, followed by a classic red herring. HuckleB Dec 2011 #9
When you have read the Toxic Metal Syndrome, The Coenzyme Q10 Phenomenon, The Lipoic Acid HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #12
In other words, you believe those who choose to push selected preliminary studies as evidence ... HuckleB Dec 2011 #23
Correlation and Causation trotsky Dec 2011 #10
So it's your goal to get as many people as possible to buy supplements? laconicsax Dec 2011 #6
Goal is to reduce the ridiculous, lower healthcare costs, improve the quality of life for those who HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #13
Well, by making posts with an unrelated subject and message, you're certainly doing something... laconicsax Dec 2011 #19
Your sig promotes someone who appears to be a cholesterol denialist who also rails against vaccines. HuckleB Dec 2011 #11
Rails against vaccines?? I call bullshit.... that is slander in the third degree. I think I'll send HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #16
Thank you for proving my point. HuckleB Dec 2011 #21
+1,000,000,000,000 HuckleB Dec 2011 #4
How do either of those studies have anything to do with your subject? kdmorris Dec 2011 #2
Read the conclusions, the answers are there. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #17
No, they are not kdmorris Dec 2011 #20
I don't get it. Chemisse Dec 2011 #7
I am pushing so that someone somewhere will do something that gets it prescribed to patients HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #14
I think you need to understand the effect your posts have EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #18
People who work on the medical field know exactly what this stuff means. n'/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #28
And? EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #29
Well, the idea is to present some medical language in the hopes of supporting MineralMan Dec 2011 #30
The audience which consists of about 4 people it would seem, can read a conclusion indicating HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #34
I don't mean to give you a hard time and I appreciate your response. Chemisse Dec 2011 #24
If you read my sig and realize that Dr. Sinatra is a cardiologist of probably 40 years or better it HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #15
Thank you for offering another logical fallacy. HuckleB Dec 2011 #22
Tis the season to not see you, fa la la la la I don't see you. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #27
You must be referring to the Ignore feature. MineralMan Dec 2011 #31
I'm referring to the little strips of sticky notes I have cut and placed on my monitor wherever HB HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #32
Try this: laconicsax Dec 2011 #33
And what will I do with these 300 or so strips of paper?? Here is a conclusion that HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #35
You could grind them up and sell them as supplements. laconicsax Dec 2011 #37
Interesting that you would go there, when this is about helping people find a HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #38
You may find this link interesting: laconicsax Dec 2011 #39
Nope.... you may find this interesting... and realize that the supplements used are the HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #40
9 out of 32! laconicsax Dec 2011 #42
Heh heh heh heh heh heh heh. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #43
Thats PROOF! Dammit. PROOF! MineralMan Dec 2011 #45
72% didn't respond to treatment! What more could you ask for to show that PycnoQ10 works ? laconicsax Dec 2011 #46
Well, natch! MineralMan Dec 2011 #47
Have you been told that elevated homocysteine levels are a good indicator HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #36
Have you been told that assumptions are a poor way to discuss matters of health? HuckleB Dec 2011 #48
Do you realize that you don't know a thing about the topic at hand? Also you are unwilling to even HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #52
How would you know what I know? HuckleB Dec 2011 #55
Unfortunately, I can't take any doctor at face value kdmorris Dec 2011 #25
Dr. Sinatra is also a web merchant, selling products MineralMan Dec 2011 #26
How conveniently you ignore the printed page right in front of your face. n/t HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #41
I ignore nothing. I did a pretty thorough look at Dr. Sinatra's supplement sales site. MineralMan Dec 2011 #44
Here is the difference in simple layman's terms. HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #49
What are the n values on those studies, 12? laconicsax Dec 2011 #50
Let's see if your math is strong. Say you have 9 people who benefit from a non toxic HysteryDiagnosis Dec 2011 #51
And 73% get no benefit! laconicsax Dec 2011 #53
That study was too small to produce any meaningful data. MineralMan Dec 2011 #54
What makes you think I need things put in "simple, laymen's terms?" MineralMan Dec 2011 #56
The poster in question EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #57
So I understand. Thanks for letting me know. MineralMan Dec 2011 #58
Sorry but anyone who writes on his board something so ridiculous as: LeftishBrit Dec 2011 #59
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Reversing disease by read...»Reply #49