Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Seems like magazine capacity in the conn. shooting was a practically a non-issue. [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)18. In other words, you have no problem watching massacre after massacre...
It doesn't matter how many innocent people die, just don't touch dem gunz!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Seems like magazine capacity in the conn. shooting was a practically a non-issue. [View all]
virginia mountainman
Jan 2013
OP
So we can assume your recommendation is to ban everything right down to single-shot 22's?
Scuba
Jan 2013
#1
Did your friends need Ar-15s and hi-cap clips to scare their would-be attackers?
Starboard Tack
Jan 2013
#127
This will make "Democrats un-electable in the vast majority of the nation". Well said.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#19
The Bill of Rights guarantees a bundle of genuine rights which (your) 2A contravenes.
Loudly
Jan 2013
#41
Are you claiming that people's genuine rights are sufficient to protect them from your 2A?
Loudly
Jan 2013
#54
Ordinary people of all races and in all regions inherently support the natural right to self-defense
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#28
Where in the 2nd is self defense? Oh, thats right Scalia "Corporations are People"
flamin lib
Jan 2013
#103
Here's what Garrison Keillor said, and he didn't need to use any vulgarities to say it:
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#82
You're suggesting that without the votes of NRA members Obama would have lost? Yeah, sure.
Scuba
Jan 2013
#48
So you know all of the proposed regulations that will be made Biden's task force ...
spin
Jan 2013
#98
But what about the NRA's constant warning that Obama was "gonna take yer guns"?????
Scuba
Jan 2013
#87
then nobody will mind if we restrict them all to 10 rounds, or better yet 5
phantom power
Jan 2013
#2
Anyone that seriously thinks they need more than 10 round magazines to protect....
Bonhomme Richard
Jan 2013
#12
We have a different version of events in this report...but RKBA never seems to post this newer one
pkdu
Jan 2013
#153
But you made a specific claim about the docile nature of Cototes that was wrong.
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#160
I don't care about your opinion. I'm the one dealing with the situation and you're at your keyboard
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#73
maybe you should stay in the house or in the library if you are so fearful...eom
Kolesar
Jan 2013
#84
As they are so easy to change, there is no reason to argue against limiting capacity to 10 rounds
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#3
Yes, because what is special about 10 rounds? Why such an arbitrary number?
virginia mountainman
Jan 2013
#9
What Did take Place In New Orleans - My Memory Is That The Police Indiscriminately Killed Refugees
cantbeserious
Jan 2013
#133
This Is The Reason We Have A Regulated Militia Called The National Guard
cantbeserious
Jan 2013
#135
Beg Your Pardon - National Guard Is State-Based And Citizen-Soldier Militia
cantbeserious
Jan 2013
#137
I Think You Know The Answers To Those Questions Already; Go Ask The NOPD
cantbeserious
Jan 2013
#141
Exactly, the problem isn't limited to high capacity magazines. Guns are the problem.
bowens43
Jan 2013
#30
Yep agreed - why we need to outlaw all repeating arms without fixed magazines, if
jmg257
Jan 2013
#96
well a non-issue to you. From your posts, we know that all gun violence victims are "non-issues"
villager
Jan 2013
#101