Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

petronius

(26,602 posts)

5. I would oppose that as well. An exemption for active/on-duty weapons is

Reply to gejohnston (Original post)

Sun May 26, 2013, 08:46 PM

May 2013

fine, and maybe that should apply to licensed and regulated private security firms in some circumstances, but other than that the law should be everyone or no one. And I really think it should be "no one" - magazine limits should be 'standard capacity' IMO...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A loosening of NY SAFE Act I Oppose. [View all] gejohnston May 2013 OP

I agree Duckhunter935 May 2013 #1

I have the feeling I will be next gejohnston May 2013 #4

This is an interesting conundrum sarisataka May 2013 #2

Anyone with a family or life worth living should be exempt. ileus May 2013 #3

I would oppose that as well. An exemption for active/on-duty weapons is petronius May 2013 #5