Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
2. Love the generic pictures
Tue May 15, 2012, 01:55 PM
May 2012

"Hey, find a bunch of gun pictures on flickr and stick 'em in this article, would ya?"

Besides that, it's absurd how aggressive the no-carry states are about enforcing laws that don't apply. When a department consistently acts on the basis of their officers' personal determination that "well, it shouldn't be legal" and completely abrogate the law, it's time to relieve them of police power. Just another reason the nation's lobby is not fit for home rule.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another tragic example, Oneka May 2012 #1
Love the generic pictures Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #2
Sodom-on-Gomorrah strikes again. PavePusher May 2012 #3
AFAIC... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #4
If you lmit the draft to offending DAs, judges, "officers of the law", council members, the mayor TPaine7 May 2012 #5
grabbers love stories like this, in their mind the injustice was some civilian ileus May 2012 #6
You gotta love Republican gun nuts... DanTex May 2012 #7
In addition to the Second Amendment... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #8
Federal protections applied -- he did not break the law. Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #9
"According to the article" ... in the Washington Times. DanTex May 2012 #10
If you didn't read the article, you're talking out your ass Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #12
Well, you're definitely talking out of your ass, so obviously reading the article didn't help... DanTex May 2012 #13
Did Mr. Kim kill somebody? Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #14
Did I say he did? No. DanTex May 2012 #16
out of those eighty people who were killed gejohnston May 2012 #19
Funny you bring up "faux outrage"... DanTex May 2012 #21
DC's nonsense will deter what? gejohnston May 2012 #24
D.C. broke the "sane gun laws" you advocate. PavePusher May 2012 #15
Did I say it was a good thing? DanTex May 2012 #18
So you admit to being O.K. with the government seizing people's property... PavePusher May 2012 #25
You have a vivid imagination. DanTex May 2012 #26
Stopping at the VA may have violated the federal protection. ManiacJoe May 2012 #11
Actually, I have to pity morally and ethically challenged anti-gun nuts who can't think clearly. TPaine7 May 2012 #17
More loony than the average TPaine7 post! DanTex May 2012 #20
using this definition, gejohnston May 2012 #22
Only a select few... Clames May 2012 #23
Then you wouldn't mind if I stole your wallet "for a while?" Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #27
What is this "registration" you speak of... PavePusher May 2012 #30
Excellent post...maybe the best one in this whole thread. ileus May 2012 #28
Seems there is good news now. Clames May 2012 #29
Like another one of those 6 or 7 figure check$? DonP May 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Injured vet’s guns stolen...»Reply #2