Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Guys Rob Store with Ak-47, Get Laughed At (Video) [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)38. Two words: liability and cost
. So why does just about every major business in this country...
...tell it's employees to cooperate in a robbery. It's becoming rare to even see an armed guard in a bank, even one's that have been subjected to multiple robberies.
Firstly, very few businesses give a shit if something bad happens to their minimum wage clerk behind the counter. So rather than risk a policy that allows them to be armed, and risk them doing something stupid with a gun and harming their business, they would rather that their employees not be armed, and if something bad happens, well just cooperate because you have no other choice.
But the main reason that you don't see armed guards in many places is that there simply isn't enough to steal to harm the business' bottom line. Many places have time-delay safes so you can't harm the business' profits through armed robbery. You might get a couple of hundred bucks from the register but that's about it.
But you look at armored car drivers delivering cash - they sure as shit are armed. That's because there is the potential for some serious loss, so they want that shit protected.
The bottom line: employees are disposable.
...tell it's employees to cooperate in a robbery. It's becoming rare to even see an armed guard in a bank, even one's that have been subjected to multiple robberies.
Firstly, very few businesses give a shit if something bad happens to their minimum wage clerk behind the counter. So rather than risk a policy that allows them to be armed, and risk them doing something stupid with a gun and harming their business, they would rather that their employees not be armed, and if something bad happens, well just cooperate because you have no other choice.
But the main reason that you don't see armed guards in many places is that there simply isn't enough to steal to harm the business' bottom line. Many places have time-delay safes so you can't harm the business' profits through armed robbery. You might get a couple of hundred bucks from the register but that's about it.
But you look at armored car drivers delivering cash - they sure as shit are armed. That's because there is the potential for some serious loss, so they want that shit protected.
The bottom line: employees are disposable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations