Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Clergy call for statewide gun registration [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)42. Pistols are military weapons.
then indeed we should ban pistols and other non-military weapons
Pistols are military weapons.
and the military weapons in the hands of the civilian militia should be strictly regulated, as they are for example in switzerland.
Except this is not Switzerland. This is the United States of America, and per our Constitution, the people are to keep and bear arms suitable for use in a militia, and that right shall not be infringed.
I'm willing to endure some restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms, so long as they do not undermine the intent of the second amendment.
Also, as simply having such a weapon is useless for such purposes if you are not also trained not only in its use but in its use within a military organization, the well regulated civilian militia must also be trained to be a military organization.
Having a gun and no training is indeed bad when you need a gun. Having neither a gun nor training is worse. Fortunately, I train at least monthly.
Pistols are military weapons.
and the military weapons in the hands of the civilian militia should be strictly regulated, as they are for example in switzerland.
Except this is not Switzerland. This is the United States of America, and per our Constitution, the people are to keep and bear arms suitable for use in a militia, and that right shall not be infringed.
I'm willing to endure some restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms, so long as they do not undermine the intent of the second amendment.
Also, as simply having such a weapon is useless for such purposes if you are not also trained not only in its use but in its use within a military organization, the well regulated civilian militia must also be trained to be a military organization.
Having a gun and no training is indeed bad when you need a gun. Having neither a gun nor training is worse. Fortunately, I train at least monthly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
News and opinion pieces are posted without comment in many forums and groups on DU
SecularMotion
Sep 2012
#46
Right, because anyone who supports the right to keep and bear arms can't really be a Democrat. n/t
Atypical Liberal
Sep 2012
#32
How horrible for you to have to put up with postings here you disagree with
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#62
I was referring to DT's comment about real Democrats posting, pointing out that I and other real
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#73
It's also President Obama's stated opinion. Is *he* wrong, in your estimation?
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2012
#77
Now, *there's* a way to quiet the SC critics- mention United States v. Jones.
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2012
#82
I wasn't asking about swords, and you didn't answer the question that was posed...
Marengo
Sep 2012
#80
In australia registration and banning of semi-automatic rifles and shotguns
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#53
I'm saying that nothing more occurred. Tyranny did not ensue. Gun ownership remained legal.
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#63
Religion in the wrong hands has led to thousands/millions of deaths
4th law of robotics
Sep 2012
#50
For years the black churches have been what held the communities together
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#74