Clergy call for statewide gun registration

[friendly_iconoclast]

77. It's also President Obama's stated opinion. Is *he* wrong, in your estimation?

I daresay he knows more about Constitutional law than you do..

http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/mailbag/president-obama-we-must-seek-agreement-on-gun-reforms/article_011e7118-8951-5206-a878-39bfbc9dc89d.html#ixzz1kV5SUkry

" ...Now, like the majority of Americans, I believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. And the courts have settled that as the law of the land. In this country, we have a strong tradition of gun ownership that's handed from generation to generation. Hunting and shooting are part of our national heritage. And, in fact, my administration has not curtailed the rights of gun owners - it has expanded them, including allowing people to carry their guns in national parks and wildlife refuges.

The fact is, almost all gun owners in America are highly responsible. They're our friends and neighbors. They buy their guns legally and use them safely, whether for hunting or target shooting, collection or protection. And that's something that gun-safety advocates need to accept..."

And now, let me ask you a question- What's your opinion of United States v. Jones?


http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-jones/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117211085#post62

62. Don't you have just a *wee* bit of consternation about United States v Jones?

A 9-0 decision throwing out warrantless surveillance via GPS- with the opinion written by the Great Satan Scalia?

What to do, what to do- 1) agree with Scalia's opinion (gasp!), 2)throw in with the 'surveillance state' types like Bolton and Woo, or 3) pretend it doesn't exist?

So far, the other Scalia haters have gone for option #3. How about you?...

And nine months later, the Scalia bashers have yet to say word one about this. I guess it messes up their genetic/association fallacies..