Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AldoLeopold

(617 posts)
4. We know there was only 1 wounded
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 07:02 PM
Dec 2012

Only one left wounded. I don't know if they're an adult or child. This is horrible. I'm an anti-humanist to the core, but this has made me sick to my stomach.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why were there no wounded? [View all] oldhippie Dec 2012 OP
i've heard varying report, but i believe the latest number of wounded is 9. unblock Dec 2012 #1
I just watched the press conference by law enforcement officials AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #5
1 We don't know that yet. trof Dec 2012 #2
We know there was only 1 wounded AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #4
Sadly true. oldhippie Dec 2012 #7
The little piece on my brain is 20 dead elementary school children. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #3
Some of us are not quivering masses of emotion incapable of ....... oldhippie Dec 2012 #6
Some of us have a sense of common decency, some concern for the dead. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #8
That's ridiculous AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #9
the o.p. acknowledged the emotion and the tragedy. unblock Dec 2012 #10
Take your attitude somewhere else, please... tortoise1956 Dec 2012 #11
x2 AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #51
I am very happy for your decency and concern ... oldhippie Dec 2012 #13
What gives you the right to question someone else's Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #19
Did you read the OP... Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #27
it is about putting the blame on the proper shoulders gejohnston Dec 2012 #28
There's more than one way to address a tragedy. Glaug-Eldare Dec 2012 #30
You led off with disrespect and expect to gain some high ground? Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #35
There were wounded. yellerpup Dec 2012 #12
I wasn't aware of that oldhippie Dec 2012 #14
I know. Just kills me. n/t yellerpup Dec 2012 #31
One might reason AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #15
I read that in the NY Post. yellerpup Dec 2012 #32
The vice principal was shot in the foot LiberalEsto Dec 2012 #16
What has happened is that finally someone really "knew what they were doing". Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #17
Other reports are that it was pistol only ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #23
He left his "assault rifle" in his car rl6214 Dec 2012 #47
Not according to the news accounts I've seen today (Sunday): thucythucy Dec 2012 #64
"Someone took an assault rifle ...and ... blew away ..." Does it matter to you if he didn't? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #52
It remains to be seen. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #53
"Either way, the weapon is irrelevant." That's not what you said. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #54
The qustion is "Why were there no wounded". And yes, the weapon is irrelevant. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #55
not really gejohnston Dec 2012 #56
Like homicide investigators... sarisataka Dec 2012 #18
Large caliber, small children. DollarBillHines Dec 2012 #20
Because gun control means hitting your target jpak Dec 2012 #21
If I thought it would do any good, tortoise1956 Dec 2012 #22
I am starting to believe sarisataka Dec 2012 #24
We all know the typical characters that do rl6214 Dec 2012 #48
Next time you are at a gun show jpak Dec 2012 #59
strange, I never saw any of that stuff at the ones I go to. gejohnston Dec 2012 #60
That is despicable. jeepnstein Dec 2012 #26
He's fed up AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #33
disgusting. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #29
This is a bumper sticker ALWAYS on sale any ANY gun show in the US jpak Dec 2012 #57
Hey Jpak CokeMachine Dec 2012 #37
The blood is on the hands of the GOP gun nuts that let the AW ban lapse jpak Dec 2012 #58
I don't know but CokeMachine Dec 2012 #62
I'll try and answer it as best I can ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #25
Younger victims are also less like to react by running or fighting back. NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #34
Higher surface area to volume ratio AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #36
That is one way to look at it ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #38
The rifle wasn't used rl6214 Dec 2012 #49
Actually, latest reports say thucythucy Dec 2012 #63
Academic? ellisonz Dec 2012 #40
It was a technical answer to what I took as an honest question ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #41
I wouldn't describe that so much as "academic" or "technical" ellisonz Dec 2012 #42
if we are going to speculate gejohnston Dec 2012 #43
You might want to talk to someone you know with a forensics background ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #44
That's probably still ellisonz Dec 2012 #45
Tap tapping away rl6214 Dec 2012 #50
Here's my theory. Dr_Scholl Dec 2012 #39
May well be some merit to the theory Kennah Dec 2012 #46
Medical examiner pointed out that each victim was shot an absolute minimum of three times, and some mbperrin Dec 2012 #61
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Why were there no wounded...»Reply #4