Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Why were there no wounded? [View all]sarisataka
(22,711 posts)18. Like homicide investigators...
we must ask questions we would rather not ask to get answers we need to prevent another occurrence.
Pure guesses at this time:
adults can take more damage than children
in other shootings many victims have a chance to run that these children did not
the shooter had time to be methodical as many others shoot randomly
The though of doing something like this is so alien that I get physically ill just trying to think of answers. It is a very small price if collectively we can produce one small idea that would have the slightest effect....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What has happened is that finally someone really "knew what they were doing".
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2012
#17
"Someone took an assault rifle ...and ... blew away ..." Does it matter to you if he didn't?
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#52
The qustion is "Why were there no wounded". And yes, the weapon is irrelevant.
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2012
#55
You might want to talk to someone you know with a forensics background
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#44