Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Why were there no wounded? [View all]AldoLeopold
(617 posts)36. Higher surface area to volume ratio
The rifle was a Bushmaster AR - 15. .223 caliber rounds. I can't imagine what the EMT's and law enforcement officials found.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What has happened is that finally someone really "knew what they were doing".
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2012
#17
"Someone took an assault rifle ...and ... blew away ..." Does it matter to you if he didn't?
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#52
The qustion is "Why were there no wounded". And yes, the weapon is irrelevant.
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2012
#55
You might want to talk to someone you know with a forensics background
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#44