Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Why were there no wounded? [View all]ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)38. That is one way to look at it
A friend was horrified at my #10 can analogy, until she held one up to her child and got my point.
First responders are going to have a hard time with this. One of my daughters was in Haiti, and there are things there she said rocked her core. This could be no different, and some most likely knew some of the victims.
Its not clear if the rifle was used or not. Not sure it matters while you are in mourning as to type, caliber or other means. The details will be come more clear over time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What has happened is that finally someone really "knew what they were doing".
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2012
#17
"Someone took an assault rifle ...and ... blew away ..." Does it matter to you if he didn't?
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#52
The qustion is "Why were there no wounded". And yes, the weapon is irrelevant.
Atypical Liberal
Dec 2012
#55
You might want to talk to someone you know with a forensics background
ProgressiveProfessor
Dec 2012
#44