Gun Control & RKBA

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)

55. The qustion is "Why were there no wounded". And yes, the weapon is irrelevant.

Sat Dec 15, 2012, 02:18 PM

Dec 2012

The reason why there were no wounded is because this person knew how to shoot a gun.

At the time I wrote my initial post, the reports were that there were .223 cases at the crime scene.

Now it seems that the .223 may not have been used.

Does it matter? It may have been even worse if he had brought the assault rifle.

The reason why there were no wounded is because this guy knew what he was doing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why were there no wounded? [View all] oldhippie Dec 2012 OP

i've heard varying report, but i believe the latest number of wounded is 9. unblock Dec 2012 #1

I just watched the press conference by law enforcement officials AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #5

1 We don't know that yet. trof Dec 2012 #2

We know there was only 1 wounded AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #4

Sadly true. oldhippie Dec 2012 #7

The little piece on my brain is 20 dead elementary school children. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #3

Some of us are not quivering masses of emotion incapable of ....... oldhippie Dec 2012 #6

Some of us have a sense of common decency, some concern for the dead. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #8

That's ridiculous AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #9

the o.p. acknowledged the emotion and the tragedy. unblock Dec 2012 #10

Take your attitude somewhere else, please... tortoise1956 Dec 2012 #11

x2 AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #51

I am very happy for your decency and concern ... oldhippie Dec 2012 #13

What gives you the right to question someone else's Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #19

Did you read the OP... Agnosticsherbet Dec 2012 #27

it is about putting the blame on the proper shoulders gejohnston Dec 2012 #28

There's more than one way to address a tragedy. Glaug-Eldare Dec 2012 #30

You led off with disrespect and expect to gain some high ground? Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #35

There were wounded. yellerpup Dec 2012 #12

I wasn't aware of that oldhippie Dec 2012 #14

I know. Just kills me. n/t yellerpup Dec 2012 #31

One might reason AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #15

I read that in the NY Post. yellerpup Dec 2012 #32

The vice principal was shot in the foot LiberalEsto Dec 2012 #16

What has happened is that finally someone really "knew what they were doing". Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #17

Other reports are that it was pistol only ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #23

He left his "assault rifle" in his car rl6214 Dec 2012 #47

Not according to the news accounts I've seen today (Sunday): thucythucy Dec 2012 #64

"Someone took an assault rifle ...and ... blew away ..." Does it matter to you if he didn't? AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #52

It remains to be seen. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #53

"Either way, the weapon is irrelevant." That's not what you said. AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #54

The qustion is "Why were there no wounded". And yes, the weapon is irrelevant. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #55

not really gejohnston Dec 2012 #56

Like homicide investigators... sarisataka Dec 2012 #18

Large caliber, small children. DollarBillHines Dec 2012 #20

Because gun control means hitting your target jpak Dec 2012 #21

If I thought it would do any good, tortoise1956 Dec 2012 #22

I am starting to believe sarisataka Dec 2012 #24

We all know the typical characters that do rl6214 Dec 2012 #48

Next time you are at a gun show jpak Dec 2012 #59

strange, I never saw any of that stuff at the ones I go to. gejohnston Dec 2012 #60

That is despicable. jeepnstein Dec 2012 #26

He's fed up AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #33

disgusting. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #29

This is a bumper sticker ALWAYS on sale any ANY gun show in the US jpak Dec 2012 #57

Hey Jpak CokeMachine Dec 2012 #37

The blood is on the hands of the GOP gun nuts that let the AW ban lapse jpak Dec 2012 #58

I don't know but CokeMachine Dec 2012 #62

I'll try and answer it as best I can ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #25

Younger victims are also less like to react by running or fighting back. NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #34

Higher surface area to volume ratio AldoLeopold Dec 2012 #36

That is one way to look at it ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #38

The rifle wasn't used rl6214 Dec 2012 #49

Actually, latest reports say thucythucy Dec 2012 #63

Academic? ellisonz Dec 2012 #40

It was a technical answer to what I took as an honest question ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #41

I wouldn't describe that so much as "academic" or "technical" ellisonz Dec 2012 #42

if we are going to speculate gejohnston Dec 2012 #43

You might want to talk to someone you know with a forensics background ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #44

That's probably still ellisonz Dec 2012 #45

Tap tapping away rl6214 Dec 2012 #50

Here's my theory. Dr_Scholl Dec 2012 #39

May well be some merit to the theory Kennah Dec 2012 #46

Medical examiner pointed out that each victim was shot an absolute minimum of three times, and some mbperrin Dec 2012 #61