Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

In reply to the discussion: Can the NFL really claim parity [View all]

ProfessorGAC

(76,826 posts)
14. Really?
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 12:09 PM
Dec 2011

I think it greatly undervalues completion percentage and slightly so for yards per attempt. I think interceptions are overrated, because an interception of a 40 yard pass on 3rd down does no more damage than a punt. But, INT's kill a QB's rating.

If INT's are going to be highly rated, they should have another factor for INT's that result in the other team scoring on that next possession. (Or a defensive score.) Then the actual damage of an INT can be better judged.

Some risk taking QB's with good defenses really don't hurt the team that much with an intercepted 15 yard out at the opponents 35 yard lline. The other team may end up just having to punt it back anyway.

I think it needs a lot of weighting adjustment. I like the idea of indexing a series of stats, but i don't think they're doing QBR properly.
GAC

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Can the NFL really claim ...»Reply #14