Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

(16,113 posts)

18. We do.

Thu Dec 29, 2011, 06:19 PM

Dec 2011

QB rating is a very flawed statistic, but even the number of INT's can be deceptive when trying to evaluate QB's.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can the NFL really claim parity [View all] Doctor_J Dec 2011 OP

There is parity in terms of funding. WilliamPitt Dec 2011 #1

The real problem, which you note, is the lack of decent QBs... joeybee12 Dec 2011 #2

More spread offenses being played by colleges? Auggie Dec 2011 #3

Could be, or maybe it's just my perception... joeybee12 Dec 2011 #5

Yeah, it's bizarre Doctor_J Dec 2011 #4

And Peyton, Ben and Tom are past their prime... joeybee12 Dec 2011 #6

I look at it differently than you do JonLP24 Dec 2011 #7

Your post doesn't contradict mine Doctor_J Dec 2011 #10

Based on the numbers I look at JonLP24 Dec 2011 #13

Really? ProfessorGAC Dec 2011 #14

Then We Clearly Agree ProfessorGAC Dec 2011 #17

We do. hughee99 Dec 2011 #18

Vick a journeyman? No creo que es verdad. marmar Dec 2011 #8

Skill set - elite Doctor_J Dec 2011 #9

I think you accidentally put Vick on that list. trumad Dec 2011 #16

Some guys just take longer to develop Auggie Dec 2011 #12