Religion

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)

7. Yes, with one condition. Host discussions need to be public.

Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:06 PM

Dec 2011

I mean to say, when hosts need to decide something, how they come to forming a consensus need to be public info. No secret meetings, no star chambers. If a thread is locked, then the opinions of the hosts as to what to do need to made public, so that the trust of the test of us can remain high.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Religion Group Hosts Proposal (Please vote by Thursday at 11:59PM EST). [View all] Renew Deal Dec 2011 OP

Yes. LAGC Dec 2011 #1

Yes Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #2

Yes (note I am one of the proposed hosts) muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #3

Ah, well, I hadn't read your post when I voted "No Hosts" Adsos Letter Dec 2011 #37

You can edit it, if you want muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #39

No, that's alright. My initial response was "No Host," until I read your post... Adsos Letter Dec 2011 #40

Yes laconicsax Dec 2011 #4

Yes deacon_sephiroth Dec 2011 #5

Yes. ZombieHorde Dec 2011 #6

Yes, with one condition. Host discussions need to be public. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #7

I think that's fine. Renew Deal Dec 2011 #16

Yes. It would increase the trust if all hosts opinions cleanhippie Dec 2011 #17

Yes - would be honored to work with this group and think Renew Deal is optimal person for the lead. cbayer Dec 2011 #8

yes, but no locking of on-topic threads lazarus Dec 2011 #9

Yes. +1. cleanhippie Dec 2011 #18

yes Thats my opinion Dec 2011 #10

YES Dorian Gray Dec 2011 #11

Yes. Jim__ Dec 2011 #12

Yes, but I will add that I think a mechanism must be put in place to enable "jury" decisions to be humblebum Dec 2011 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Goblinmonger Dec 2011 #14

We have no control over jury decisions at all cleanhippie Dec 2011 #19

Try Here, Sir The Magistrate Dec 2011 #20

You'd have to take that up with Skinner, et al. Hosts have no power over jury decisions. n/t iris27 Dec 2011 #21

No Hosts. Adsos Letter Dec 2011 #15

Yes. iris27 Dec 2011 #22

Yes. rrneck Dec 2011 #23

No hosts. rug Dec 2011 #24

LOL! Adsos Letter Dec 2011 #50

Yes! Yes please! LiberalAndProud Dec 2011 #25

excellent choices maddezmom Dec 2011 #26

I vote yes - the sooner the better EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #27

+1000 maddezmom Dec 2011 #28

Yes. immoderate Dec 2011 #29

Yes. Tonight definitely highlights the need WhollyHeretic Dec 2011 #30

YES frogmarch Dec 2011 #31

I'm fine with it. But I have to wonder if tonight's little troll/sockpuppet wasn't an... TygrBright Dec 2011 #32

This person posted nasty crap in several other forums that were alerted and hidden and had at least WhollyHeretic Dec 2011 #34

Yes, they were a definite troll EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #35

I wish we were that manipulative. Renew Deal Dec 2011 #43

Oh yes uriel1972 Dec 2011 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author laconicsax Dec 2011 #36

Yes. westerebus Dec 2011 #38

Yes nt WolverineDG Dec 2011 #41

Hell Yes... SidDithers Dec 2011 #42

Whatever. beam me up scottie Dec 2011 #44

Hosts can lock threads. nt ZombieHorde Dec 2011 #45

They cannot prevent jurors from abusing their powers. beam me up scottie Dec 2011 #48

Yes (nt) mr blur Dec 2011 #46

Yes. Nihil Dec 2011 #47

Yes rexcat Dec 2011 #49

Thanks for the support! Renew Deal Dec 2011 #51