Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)

17. Wonderful! I'm happy that you can use my posts to contrast against yours.

Reply to humblebum (Reply #16)

Tue Feb 28, 2012, 03:29 PM

Feb 2012

Now you know what you need to do to improve the witless stuff you provide, and while entertaining, it's pretty sophomoric and boring.

Glad I could help. Have a great day.

10 bucks says you are unable to resist the urge to respond and provide us with yet another witless, sophomoric, and boorish post.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In light of some recent postings and articles, it's time to revisit this...again. [View all] cleanhippie Feb 2012 OP

This is a Sisyphean task I fear, but thanks. dmallind Feb 2012 #1

Now, about that broken record thing. nt humblebum Feb 2012 #2

I agree, now tell it the folks that can't seem to tell the difference between gnosticism and theism. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #8

About that "witless sarcasm" thing. nt humblebum Feb 2012 #12

What about it! cleanhippie Feb 2012 #15

I have no problem identifying it. I only need to observe a general cross-section humblebum Feb 2012 #16

Wonderful! I'm happy that you can use my posts to contrast against yours. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #17

Well it's good to know that I am learning "witless stuff" from the best. And humblebum Feb 2012 #18

If my pointing out the witless sarcasm of your posts is "learning it" from me... cleanhippie Feb 2012 #21

Yawn ZZZZZZZZ humblebum Feb 2012 #25

Thanks for supporting my point....again. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #26

instead of using the symbol for ONE religion try using a circle nt msongs Feb 2012 #3

What do you mean? cleanhippie Feb 2012 #9

It looks like I'm a religious, as well as a political, non-Euclidian saras Feb 2012 #4

How so? dmallind Feb 2012 #11

Hmm tama Feb 2012 #23

I take it the edhopper Feb 2012 #5

theism and gnosticism are mutually exclusive. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #6

theism and gnosticism are separate and very different characteristics. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #7

Well there's a bit more to gnosis dmallind Feb 2012 #10

Thanks tama Feb 2012 #13

From a multidimensional point of view tama Feb 2012 #14

"I really don't care." rug Feb 2012 #19

Actually I think this is quite thorough and accurate - with one caveat dmallind Feb 2012 #20

Sorry, I forgot the link. It's from the UK Freethinker. rug Feb 2012 #22

I very much like the complexity of this. cbayer Feb 2012 #24