Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:02 AM Jun 2014

St. Louis archbishop claims he wasn’t sure it was illegal for priests to have sex with kids [View all]

St. Louis Archbishop Robert Carlson testified last month that he wasn’t sure whether it was illegal for priests to have sex with children while he served as chancellor of the St. Paul and Minneapolis archdiocese.

The former chancellor gave a deposition last month in a lawsuit that claims the Minnesota archdiocese and the Diocese of Winona created a public nuisance by keeping information on abusive priests secret, reported Minnesota Public Radio.

The 69-year-old Carlson also faces a massive clergy abuse lawsuit in the Archdiocese of St. Louis, where he’s served as archbishop since 2009.

One document made public in that case shows more than 100 priests and church employees have been accused of sexual abuse, and the Missouri Supreme Court ordered the archdiocese to turn over their names under seal.

The Minnesota lawsuit was filed by a man who claimed a priest abused him during the 1970s, and Carlson told the plaintiff’s attorneys that his understanding of those accusations had changed over the years.

“I’m not sure whether I knew it was a crime or not,” Carlson said. “I understand today it’s a crime.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/06/10/st-louis-archbishop-claims-he-wasnt-sure-it-was-illegal-for-priests-to-have-sex-with-kids/


Wow. Just wow.

Jesus is proud, I'm sure.
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Old white men in funny hats telling people about what is right or wrong Botany Jun 2014 #1
Here's the complete transcript. rug Jun 2014 #2
God's moral authority on earth unsure if it is wrong to rape a child? Act_of_Reparation Jun 2014 #3
I see that the usual apologism skepticscott Jun 2014 #4
Where? Are you seeing things? rug Jun 2014 #5
Wait, what? JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #11
Feel free to pm me to discuss drollery. rug Jun 2014 #12
lol! beam me up scottie Jun 2014 #13
Hey now.. you weren't supposed to catch that! ;) madmom Jun 2014 #14
It took long enough to catch a softball. rug Jun 2014 #15
Maybe some people don't spend every waking minute on DU... madmom Jun 2014 #16
And even less time in Religion forum! JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #17
Why, there's been a thread on this in the forum you host for three days. rug Jun 2014 #18
I'm always fascinated by how well you know AA content. JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #19
Considering your forum's thread linked to this Group, the fascination points in the other direction. rug Jun 2014 #20
Ok, wow rug. JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #22
You're sorry for me? How kind. rug Jun 2014 #23
"After all, without evidence, you're simply posting fairy tales." truebrit71 Jun 2014 #24
Are you referring to this lovely exchange? rug Jun 2014 #25
Yes, the one where you tried to be cute... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #26
Are you in third grade? rug Jun 2014 #27
More character flaw from you? truebrit71 Jun 2014 #28
I see you're already in a summer slide. rug Jun 2014 #29
Condescension is a character flaw - Rug truebrit71 Jun 2014 #30
So is inanity. rug Jun 2014 #31
Tell you what, why don't you answer the question I asked you yesterday... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #32
Almost as bad as repetitive inanity. rug Jun 2014 #33
So that's a no then? truebrit71 Jun 2014 #34
A glimmer of insight struggles to emerge. rug Jun 2014 #36
So you make bold statements, and then run away when challenged.. truebrit71 Jun 2014 #37
I'm hardly runnning away. More like stepping over. rug Jun 2014 #38
Whatever floats your boat, mate... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #39
Don't forget, if you do come back now your statement would be dishonest. rug Jun 2014 #40
Because when you wave goodbye, you can't EVER come back...your intellectual dishonesty, however.. truebrit71 Jun 2014 #41
You must have missed the sign. rug Jun 2014 #42
Nope, just an answer to the question you keep running from... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #43
If you are referring to this, you got an answer. rug Jun 2014 #44
No, it's trying to get an answer from a pseudo-intellectual poseur... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #45
Actually, there's a third choice. rug Jun 2014 #46
Blah, blah, blah.... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #47
Save yourself the effort, mate, you won't like the answer. rug Jun 2014 #48
No effort on my part... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #49
Better a tosser than a twannock. rug Jun 2014 #50
Unfuckingbelievable. Nt EvilAL Jun 2014 #6
Lock him up. Cut the key. Scuba Jun 2014 #7
Either these guys are as sealed defacto7 Jun 2014 #8
My bet is on liar. rug Jun 2014 #9
How come, everytime my city is in the news, its for fucked up shit like this? Humanist_Activist Jun 2014 #10
No, sorry, don't buy it Prophet 451 Jun 2014 #21
Apparently this means he didn't think it was a particularly offensive sin either. trotsky Jun 2014 #35
Wa-huh!?!? LuvLoogie Jun 2014 #51
"Wow. Just wow " amuse bouche Jun 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»St. Louis archbishop clai...»Reply #0