Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
151. You want bigoted homophobic quotes? The pope's or yours?
Thu Jun 11, 2015, 04:42 PM
Jun 2015

I'm feeling charitable today, I'll be your huckleberry:

Pope Francis on gay rights: His 5 worst quotes

The new pontiff is being hailed as a fresh choice, but there's nothing new about his opposition to gay rights


Pope Francis has been praised for his humility (he picks up his own luggage!), his acceptance of other faiths (he won’t insult the Prophet Mohammed in public addresses!) and his “precedent shattering” name choice (more humility!).

But the pontiff who is being hailed as a “new direction” for the Catholic Church is the same-old brand of theological conservative who opposes the ordination of women, abortion and the fundamental rights of gays and lesbians.

In fact, then-Cardinal Jose Bergoglio was a major force against the 2010 move to legalize same-sex marriage in his native Argentina. Though he ultimately failed, Bergoglio used the full weight of the church to crush the measure.

Here, a collection of his very worst quotes on the issue.

1. A Senate vote on gay marriage is a destructive pretension against the plan of God

From a letter to the Carmelite Sisters of Buenos Aires on the perils of marriage equality:

“Let’s not be naïve, we’re not talking about a simple political battle; it is a destructive pretension against the plan of God. We are not talking about a mere bill, but rather a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.”

2. Gay marriage will destroy the family

More from the same letter to the four monasteries of Argentina:

“The Argentine people will face a situation whose outcome can seriously harm the family… At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children.

3. Gay parenting is a rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts

Again:

“At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.”

4. The political struggle against marriage equality is war

And finally:

“The bill will be discussed in the Senate after July 13. Look at San Jose, Maria, Child and ask them [to] fervently defend Argentina’s family at this time. [Be reminded] what God told his people in a time of great anguish: ‘This war is not yours but God’s.’ May they succor, defend and join God in this war.”

5. Gay adoption is discrimination against children

According to the National Catholic Reporter, Francis called gay adoption a form of “discrimination against children.” A comment that resulted in a public rebuke from Argentine President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who said that Francis’ remarks suggested “medieval times and the Inquisition.”

http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/pope_francis_on_gay_rights_his_5_worst_quotes/



Cardinal Bergoglio Hits Out at Same-Sex Marriage

A Jesuit cardinal has become the latest Church leader to speak out forcefully against a government’s push towards same-sex marriage, and has called on his nation’s contemplatives to pray fervently to prevent such laws.

According to an article in tomorrow’s L’Osservatore Romano, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the Archbishop of Buenos Aires and Primate of Argentina, has said that if a proposed bill giving same-sex couples the opportunity to marry and adopt children should be approved, it will “seriously damage the family.”

He made the statement in a letter addressed to each of the four monasteries in Argentina, asking the contemplatives to pray “fervently” that legislators be strengthened to do the right thing.

He wrote: “In the coming weeks, the Argentine people will face a situation whose outcome can seriously harm the family…At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.”

Cardinal Bergoglio continued: “Let us not be naive: this is not simply a political struggle, but it is an attempt to destroy God’s plan. It is not just a bill (a mere instrument) but a ‘move’ of the father of lies who seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.”

The cardinal also noted that “today the country, in this particular situation, needs the special assistance of the Holy Spirit to bring the light of truth on to the darkness of error, it need this advocate to defend us from being enchanted by many fallacies that are tried at all costs to justify this bill and to confuse and deceive the people of good will.”

...

Cardinal Bergoglio said the bill will be discussed in the Senate after July 13. “We look to Saint Joseph, Mary and the Child Jesus and ask that they fervently defend the family in Argentina at this particular time,” he said. “We remember what God said to his people in a moment of great anguish: ‘This war is not yours, but God’s’: defend us, then, in this war of God.”

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal_bergoglio_hits_out_at_same-sex_marriage





Your disgusting homophobic posts:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=123723

Starboard Tack (10,698 posts)
112. And this has what to do with the RCC?

Why would any couple want to marry in a church that doesn't accept them? Makes no sense.
You really look for extreme situations to provide fodder for your hatred of religion. How about if I wanted to marry my bicycle, or my hamster and some church opposed performing the ceremony, would you be there, fighting for my rights?

I'm sorry, but religious rights and gay rights are not the same thing. I support both. Seems like you only support one. I know many gay couples, some who married in church and some at town hall and some couldn't care less about the institution of marriage.

I think your views are self centered. You want the world to adapt to your values, like the vegan who wants everyone to quit eating meat. What a boring world that would be.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=124676

Starboard Tack This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide

176. Really? And how exactly did I do that?

You seem to confuse marriage and sexuality. The first is about a ceremonial binding of two entities. The second is about sex.
Who are you to tell me I cannot marry my dog, or my brother, or my mother, or my fucking bicycle, if I so wish. You don't get to decide these things. Sorry to disappoint you.

A Jury voted 5-2 to hide this post on Fri Apr 18, 2014, 05:12 PM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=124679

Starboard Tack (10,698 posts)
177. No, I am not equating it with anything.

We should all have the right to marry whomever or whatever, provided it is consensual and conducted of sound mind.
Do you have a problem with sisters marrying each other? I don't. How about other family members? Do you draw lines and, if so, why?

My point, as I'm sure you are already aware, was about seeking approval from the RCC or any other church, to get married. That approval comes from within one's own conscience. Official approval comes from the state. Fuck the church and fuck those who want to paint me as an enemy of equal rights. Fuck the bigots and bullies and nasty hate mongering anti-theists. Fuck all fascists.

Happy Easter!


You're welcome.
Destroying his reputation? Not at all. Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #1
How was he being an intolerant jerk? Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #3
I believe in respecting others' beliefs and leaving them alone Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #18
Brilliant tymorial Jun 2015 #27
Oh please...do enlighten us with your list skepticscott Jun 2015 #56
Please reread my post. tymorial Jun 2015 #61
If you want to deflect by nitpicking, fine skepticscott Jun 2015 #63
There you go again, putting words into other people's mouths. Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #92
Yeah edhopper Jun 2015 #94
Nothing wrong with challenging religious beliefs Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #193
It'd be sad skepticscott Jun 2015 #98
Prego! Manco un secondo ci voleva. Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #104
Seems to be taking a lot longer than that, Tack skepticscott Jun 2015 #109
un angelo con le corna edhopper Jun 2015 #112
Davvero! Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #121
What would that overlap be? trotsky Jun 2015 #59
As I pointed out to the other respondant to my reply tymorial Jun 2015 #62
I asked you a question. trotsky Jun 2015 #64
I'd say in his case, there probably is skepticscott Jun 2015 #65
It's all about triangulation. trotsky Jun 2015 #66
Or to accuse the other skepticscott Jun 2015 #68
I see our rather outraged friend skepticscott Jun 2015 #97
Those whose only goal is to attack religion have no interest in reading comprehension Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #102
Sorry, Tack...your buddy has fled skepticscott Jun 2015 #106
It's almost like they're vermin? truebrit71 Jun 2015 #126
I dunno. What do you think? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #134
I personally wouldn't call anyone 'vermin'... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #137
Deep and absolute sense of righteousness. tymorial Jun 2015 #163
Here or back, you've still fled from the important issues raised skepticscott Jun 2015 #165
as long as those beliefs don't cause them to do harm to others. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #72
Well, everyone's wrong some times, and this is one of yours. mr blur Jun 2015 #139
But is what he has built his career around starting to crumble? cbayer Jun 2015 #9
biology? Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #14
So by that logic, you're going to start posting about the pope and his reputation, right? trotsky Jun 2015 #15
What does the pope have to do with this story? yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #51
Everything. n/t trotsky Jun 2015 #52
Or nothing yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #55
You are most certainly entitled to your opinion. trotsky Jun 2015 #57
True. Have a great day. yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #60
The pope is the center of the universe for theophobes and belligerent atheists Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #93
Yes edhopper Jun 2015 #95
He's pretty cool with everyone, actually. Not just gays. Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #108
So, so cool edhopper Jun 2015 #111
Being opposed to same sex marriage does not make one a homophobe Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #164
Early returns are running strongly against your assertion skepticscott Jun 2015 #166
It makes you a bigot. Same as if you were opposed to interracial marriage. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #167
Yeah, edhopper Jun 2015 #168
No, actually, it is not the same thing Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #186
So far 96% disagree with you. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #184
new meme try edhopper Jun 2015 #96
Right? truebrit71 Jun 2015 #113
That's not true and you know it. But nice deflection try. Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #99
Apparently a "tolerant" atheist skepticscott Jun 2015 #101
That's why so many in here like him. Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #103
My wife? And you talk to me about deflection? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #105
How is that deflection? She posted this OP. Or did you miss that reality? Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #110
It's almost like there edhopper Jun 2015 #114
Like how anti-atheists always bring up Dawkins Lordquinton Jun 2015 #117
Well, there you go Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #120
Utterly amazing Lordquinton Jun 2015 #135
Which direct quotes? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #138
Edhopper literally just posted his anti-gay marriage quote Lordquinton Jun 2015 #146
So, is that a quote of Ed or Francis? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #170
So now that you have been shown several direct quotes Lordquinton Jun 2015 #169
Which direct quotes? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #171
"a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God." beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #173
"At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance" beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #174
"and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God." beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #175
"The family is threatened by growing efforts on the part of some to redefine the very institution... beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #176
As much as we may disagree with him on this Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #187
Denying someone their human rights because he believes they're inferior does make him a bigot. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #189
He doesn't just believe they're "inferior" skepticscott Jun 2015 #200
Nope. Tack says religious homophobia isn't really bigotry. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #205
Don't botherr edhopper Jun 2015 #172
Tack has to pretend the pope's not a bigot. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #178
It's not like he can use the excuse skepticscott Jun 2015 #201
Oh lots of people are reading this exchange. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #204
Which direct quotes? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #185
Your joking, right? Lordquinton Jun 2015 #190
The jury has spoken....... davidpdx Jun 2015 #197
"Being opposed to gay marriage does not make someone a homophobe or bigot" Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #140
Seriously Rob H. Jun 2015 #147
Depends on the textbook edhopper Jun 2015 #149
You want bigoted homophobic quotes? The pope's or yours? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #151
Daym Lordquinton Jun 2015 #153
Oh, I'm just getting started. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #156
Now I understand why Tack thinks skepticscott Jun 2015 #154
Apparently he's ignored all of the previous posts about pope homophobe. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #157
Wow! Well done BMUS, thanks for the clarity! haikugal Jun 2015 #177
Thanks, haikugal! beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #179
Good job! Take no prisoners! haikugal Jun 2015 #181
Those links are good to have handy whenever people are singing the pope's praises. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #182
"Pope Francis: Kids Must Have Moms and Dads" beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #155
Pope Francis Against Gay Marriage, Gay Adoption beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #158
Why would I vilify atheists? Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #188
See your last post where you lashed out at atheists for calling out your homophobic comments: beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #191
Quite an imagination you have there BMUS Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #192
Did you vote in the GD poll? And defend religious homophobia in the thread? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #194
I do not defend homophobia or bigotry of any kind. Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #195
As you can see I'm not the only one who thinks homophobic behaviour makes one a homophobe: beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #196
No. Only 5 were wrong. Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #202
According to the definition at religoustolerance.org both you and the pope are homophobic. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #203
You are correct about one thing Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #206
I am not your "fan" and I don't find your defense of religious bigotry the least bit amusing. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #207
Au contraire dear BMUS Starboard Tack Jun 2015 #208
Now you're saying that people who are opposed to interracial marriage aren't bigots. beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #198
Pope Francis’ new clothes: Why his progressive image is white smoke and mirrors beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #159
Pope's Shocking Hitler Youth Comparison beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #160
'If You Oppose Equal Marriage, You Are a Bigot' beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #199
But is what he has built his career around starting to crumble? AlbertCat Jun 2015 #74
That's so cute! You think he built his career around genetic biology. cbayer Jun 2015 #77
He hasn't done any evolutionary biology in over 35 years. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #81
Plus you know, like lecturing at Oxford, some sort of backwater has been unknown school. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #82
He's still an intolerant jerk. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #71
"Crusading" even Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #2
Ruh roh AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #5
Is he going to take over St John's title of Moorslayer? Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #7
Why is his choice of protein of any interest? AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #4
Chicken eatin' asshole. Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #6
His views on vegetarianism and his own choices of diet have cbayer Jun 2015 #8
I tagged it for later review and stopped reading there. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #10
Hope it is good busy and not bad busy. cbayer Jun 2015 #13
"admiration for Darwin in the way a schoolboy might worship a sporting giant." Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #11
But...but...he's a big poopy head Goblinmonger Jun 2015 #12
I saw that too edhopper Jun 2015 #16
Stupid scientists anyway pokerfan Jun 2015 #17
A hodgepodge article lacking in both style and substance Yorktown Jun 2015 #19
K&R! hrmjustin Jun 2015 #20
It's long but a really good overview of his life up to this point. cbayer Jun 2015 #21
So you understand that this is basically a reverse argument from authority right? Promethean Jun 2015 #22
Irrelevant. It's a chance to post something negative about DAWKINS!!!111!!!! cleanhippie Jun 2015 #23
There are some poor posters here skepticscott Jun 2015 #24
Doesn't matter pokerfan Jun 2015 #25
Reputation among whom? edhopper Jun 2015 #26
Or those that approach him with a certain level of critical thinking. cbayer Jun 2015 #28
you think I was being edhopper Jun 2015 #29
So I looked up bianary, because I didn't know what it meant. cbayer Jun 2015 #30
spellink alwaz bad on tablet edhopper Jun 2015 #32
How could you say the article was just petty crap? cbayer Jun 2015 #33
I am not the only one we with this opinion edhopper Jun 2015 #38
Yep. I wonder what they all have in common. cbayer Jun 2015 #42
Good critical reading? edhopper Jun 2015 #44
That's one possibility, but odds are against it. cbayer Jun 2015 #48
Clearly. I mean, everyone else who doesn't see things your way must be stupid, right? n/t trotsky Jun 2015 #53
Stupid, or big, bad meanies Yorktown Jun 2015 #85
Vermin! haikugal Jun 2015 #180
That comment was hurtful Yorktown Jun 2015 #183
But i think he needs to rethink his path. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #76
I agree. That's is a remarkable path and he deserves nothing cbayer Jun 2015 #79
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #87
His path toward the invisible and immaterial, I suppose? Yorktown Jun 2015 #86
I'd love to point out where this article is wrong tkmorris Jun 2015 #31
spot on nt snagglepuss Jun 2015 #34
Spot on what? cbayer Jun 2015 #36
She isn't criticizing him at all. She is merely submitting an analysis of who cbayer Jun 2015 #35
A) I did read it. Every word tkmorris Jun 2015 #37
You so misjudge me and I am sure you have your reasons, but this is really about you, not me. cbayer Jun 2015 #41
How can so many people "misjudge" you, cbayer? trotsky Jun 2015 #54
You're telling others to not be judgmental? Lordquinton Jun 2015 #91
And to think I was so worried about who would step up to post malarkey articles about Atheists Heddi Jun 2015 #39
That's a long time to spend on the island of misfit toys Major Nikon Jun 2015 #83
It's like 1.5 lents Heddi Jun 2015 #84
... trotsky Jun 2015 #100
His last peer-reviewed scientific paper was published over three decades ago struggle4progress Jun 2015 #40
I still think he has performed an important role and, in the end, will be honored for that. cbayer Jun 2015 #43
What door is that? struggle4progress Jun 2015 #45
Instead he frittered away his time skepticscott Jun 2015 #47
I think he performed an important role for the normalization of atheism cbayer Jun 2015 #49
That comment is unsubstantiated Yorktown Jun 2015 #50
The atheisms of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud were influential long before Dawkins appeared; struggle4progress Jun 2015 #58
I don't disagree that they were all influential, but Dawkins made atheism cbayer Jun 2015 #67
Atheism has never been skepticscott Jun 2015 #69
I agree. We should leave the antagonistic hate crusades to religion.. truebrit71 Jun 2015 #119
What door? What role? Yorktown Jun 2015 #46
Destroying his reputation..... with whom? AlbertCat Jun 2015 #70
Do you include Dennet and KraUss in that group? cbayer Jun 2015 #73
Why did you feel the need to insult AlbertCat with that label? trotsky Jun 2015 #75
I did read this junk. AlbertCat Jun 2015 #78
You didn't read it. It is a very positive, almost adoring account of his life cbayer Jun 2015 #80
It helps to read the material before spouting the dogma... Yorktown Jun 2015 #89
Ah yes, but you see, that is totally different... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #115
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #88
Holy moly, I think you've nailed something there. trotsky Jun 2015 #90
That got hidden Lordquinton Jun 2015 #107
Extremely soft call by the jury... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #116
Jury members often read the post edhopper Jun 2015 #118
Or maybe the jury saw it for what it was. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #123
Obviously not... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #125
They disagree. Obviously! hrmjustin Jun 2015 #128
Some can't stand being called on their behaviour Lordquinton Jun 2015 #133
How dare you cbayer! Have you no shame! hrmjustin Jun 2015 #122
So now atheism is a cult? truebrit71 Jun 2015 #124
Did i say that? no. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #127
Stop putting words in your mouth? These words Justin? truebrit71 Jun 2015 #129
"So now atheism is a cult?" hrmjustin Jun 2015 #130
"The cult of Dawkins" truebrit71 Jun 2015 #131
So is dawkins the leader of Athiests? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #132
Nice try. But you fail. Again. truebrit71 Jun 2015 #136
Well, yeah you did Curmudgeoness Jun 2015 #141
The cult of personality. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #142
No, your attempt to run away from what you said is dishonest... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #143
You take care of yourself. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #144
I always do. truebrit71 Jun 2015 #145
What's really hilarious is that this is a very positive article about Dawkins. cbayer Jun 2015 #148
. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #150
Is that anything like the Christian Cult of Human Sacrifice? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #152
Jesus had some pretty harsh things to say about hypocrisy Mariana Jun 2015 #161
Oh yes he did, lots of things: beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #162
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Is Richard Dawkins destro...»Reply #151