Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is Richard Dawkins destroying his reputation? [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Namely, in what ways do the behaviors of Xstian fundies and so-called "belligerent atheists" NOT overlap, and how do those contrast with the areas in which you claim they do? Which group is more likely to base their attitudes and statements on reason and evidence? Can you address those points honestly and objectively, or are you going to continue avoiding them and look to Tack for support instead?
As far as "righteousness", try "rightness" instead. It is in fact possible for one person or one group to be more right than another, for one argument to be better supported than another, even though it is impolitic among certain cliques on this board to say so when it comes to religion. But the entire site is based on that principle when it comes to politics. Are we all "belligerent" Democrats?
And yes, I'm sure you were disinclined to continue a conversation that you could see was not going to go your way, but against your point of view is not "no where".