Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
22. The short answer is no. Here's the longer answer.
Sun May 7, 2017, 02:52 PM
May 2017

The OP is about the use of the largest nonnuclear weapon against human targets.

It is not about a mid-nineteenth century kidnapping that was one of the favorite anti-Catholic subjects of the Know Nothing Party.

This is Democratic Underground not Know Nothing Underground, notwithstanding your very recent registration.

Given the interests expressed in your recent posts, read the difference in those positions.

The Know Nothing Party Platform

The 1840s and 1850s saw an enormous increase in the numbers of European immigrants, Irish and Germans especially, arriving on American shores and settling in heavily populated urban areas. Many of these immigrants subsequently became active in local politics, much to the vexation of old-stock, "real" Americans. The result was a renaissance in the formation of "nativistic" societies—small, shadowy, anti-foreign, anti-Catholic organizations, a number of which banded together in the early 1850s to form the American Party. Popularly known as "Know-Nothings" (after the response members gave when interrogated about their pro-protestant, pro-native associations), the American Party rode a wave of xenophobia and racism (not to mention political turmoil among the Whigs and Democrats, the major parties of the day) into the mid-1850s. Among the Know-Nothing's dubious political ideas was a call to extend the five-year naturalization period to twenty-one years, as well as a proscription against the holding of elected offices by Catholics and foreigners. Like much of the country, however, the Know-Nothings soon divided over the explosive slavery issue, and the power of the party quickly waned.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/american-party-platform-1856


Democratic Underground Terms of Service

No divisive group attacks

Do not smear, insult, vilify, bait, maliciously caricature, or give disrespectful nicknames to any groups of people that are part of the Democratic coalition, or that hold viewpoints commonly held by Democrats, or that support particular Democratic public figures. Do not imply that they are fake Democrats, fake progressives, conservatives, right-wingers, Republicans, or the like.

Why we have this rule: Substantive disagreement on important issues is always welcome on this website, but our members should not be made to feel unwelcome simply because they hold a different point of view. Democratic Underground welcomes all people who are members of the Democratic coalition, including the full range of center-to-left viewpoints and supporters of all Democratic public figures.

No bigotry/insensitivity

Members are expected to respect diversity and demonstrate an appropriate level of sensitivity when discussing related topics. Racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, or other forms of bigoted intolerance are not permitted.

Why we have this rule: Democratic Underground is a diverse community which includes people of every race, sex, religious belief (or lack thereof), sexual orientation, gender identity, body type, disability, age, etc. We want to promote a welcoming atmosphere for all of our members, and do not want to provide a platform for bigotry.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice

My concern is with cult leaders like this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Charles_Levin

and with assholes who still spew his crap no matter how long he's been dead.
Thank you Pope Francis. MontanaMama May 2017 #1
He can't really control an unofficial nickname for the Massive Ordnance Air Blast. No Superstition May 2017 #2
Well said PJMcK May 2017 #3
From a massive bomb and massive destruction to child molesting in two posts. rug May 2017 #5
You have my permission to complain to his predecessors about the PR cost of their moral failures. No Superstition May 2017 #6
Your permission has as much weight as your objectivity. rug May 2017 #10
Child rape and the catholic church are very relevant, aren't they? WoonTars May 2017 #12
The OP is about a bomb. rug May 2017 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #14
The diversion is all yours. The reason for your diversion is obvious. rug May 2017 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #16
Is it your "point" that molestation be mentioned in every thread, regardless of topic? rug May 2017 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #18
What is surreal is your unspooling your prejudices and calling it discussion. rug May 2017 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #21
The short answer is no. Here's the longer answer. rug May 2017 #22
No rug Cartoonist May 2017 #26
No Cartoonist. rug May 2017 #27
Pope says Cartoonist May 2017 #28
Reuters says rug May 2017 #29
Why was this posted in the religion group? Cartoonist May 2017 #30
Because, despite your reflexive mouthing about his misogyny, homophobia, pedophilia, wealth, rug May 2017 #31
how corrupt the Catholic Church is, and how complicit its members are. Cartoonist May 2017 #32
Go on Cartoonist. State how corrupt the Catholic Church is, and how complicit ts members. rug May 2017 #34
The corruption is obvious Cartoonist May 2017 #35
Let me be very clear on what you're saying. rug May 2017 #37
Yes Cartoonist May 2017 #39
Thanks for the clear answer. So much for the attack the belief not the person bullshit. rug May 2017 #40
You asked for it Cartoonist May 2017 #41
You realize yoiu're calling my family, not to mention practicing Catholics, bigots, don't you? rug May 2017 #45
I think you have that precisely backwards...you are accusing Cartoonist of being a bigot... WoonTars May 2017 #49
No, I have it precisely the right way. rug May 2017 #52
follow the money Cartoonist May 2017 #55
Nancy Pelosi? rug May 2017 #57
I don't approve of giving money to a corrupt organization. Cartoonist May 2017 #59
You're backtracking yourself into a corner, cartoonist. rug May 2017 #61
you use that word a lot Cartoonist May 2017 #54
I know precisely what it means. rug May 2017 #56
I deny calling them bigots Cartoonist May 2017 #58
Do you deny calling practicing Catholics complicit in bigotry? rug May 2017 #60
I deny it Cartoonist May 2017 #64
I know exactly what a bigot is. Someone who broadbrushes every member of a group. rug May 2017 #65
You're still clueless Cartoonist May 2017 #66
"But yes, they are complicit in financing an organization that commits heinous crimes" rug May 2017 #67
accomplice Cartoonist May 2017 #68
That, according to you, includes Biden, Pelosi and a host of others. rug May 2017 #69
I guess English isn't your first language. Cartoonist May 2017 #70
It's good enough to read the ToS - and your posts. rug May 2017 #71
A bomb named for a meaningless acronym meant as a propaganda shot at AtheistCrusader May 2017 #62
I'm having flashbacks to Zardoz Lordquinton May 2017 #8
Ouch. beam me up scottie May 2017 #9
That would require proper recognition for their past crimes... WoonTars May 2017 #11
Post removed Post removed May 2017 #19
Go start a thread on topic, woo. rug May 2017 #23
Could you point me in the direction of where he admits the criminality WoonTars May 2017 #33
Sure I could. rug May 2017 #36
My badge? I don't follow? WoonTars May 2017 #42
If you're talking about "admissions of criminality" you're no longer talking religious issues. rug May 2017 #44
Yeah, still not following? WoonTars May 2017 #46
There are a lot of levels in the abuse scandals (thy're not all sexual). rug May 2017 #50
"There is no moral rationale"...I agree. WoonTars May 2017 #51
If anyone puts their faith in the people running it, yes. rug May 2017 #53
That has been done (the admission) countless times in the last decade or so. George II May 2017 #38
Of their culpability in the crimes and the cover-up? WoonTars May 2017 #43
Whom....'see what eludes whom'... WoonTars May 2017 #47
Single quotes drive me nuts. rug May 2017 #48
It's a republican mother. Turbineguy May 2017 #4
The "mother church" Igel May 2017 #7
In that usage, it is a figure of speech, MineralMan May 2017 #24
I agree with the pope on this one. hrmjustin May 2017 #25
Organizations composed exclusively of men shouldn't either Lordquinton May 2017 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»'Mother' should not be us...»Reply #22