Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)

34. Sad when that happens.

Reply to yallerdawg (Reply #28)

Tue May 8, 2018, 07:15 PM

May 2018

Some even call it dialogue.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did the dying Stephen Hawking really mean to strengthen the case for God? [View all] yallerdawg May 2018 OP

Even yet more god-did-it "god of the gaps" poo-poo-ca-ca. longship May 2018 #1

Would this be the "baby talk" scientific argument against a Creator? yallerdawg May 2018 #2

I don't have to demonstrate the lack of a creator. longship May 2018 #4

Considering the lack of - and in some cases - the highly unlikely development... yallerdawg May 2018 #6

Thou shalt not multiply entities unnecessarily. longship May 2018 #8

Well, I'll consider myself to "not be allowed." yallerdawg May 2018 #10

Science protects its turf fairly well these days. longship May 2018 #11

Yes. I understand. Dismissed. yallerdawg May 2018 #13

Not fundamentalist. Just the rules of the game. longship May 2018 #16

Apparently, playing by the rules makes one a rigid fundamentalist. Mariana May 2018 #31

Well, who knows what was meant there? longship May 2018 #33

No, a hypothesis is not automatically considered valid until proven untrue marylandblue May 2018 #18

If concepts of God and religions were just thought up in a playground sandbox... yallerdawg May 2018 #19

Sience is limited by the unprovable marylandblue May 2018 #20

These are concepts thought out by some of our greatest minds, etc. Mariana May 2018 #21

Oopsie! There's another one of those pesky rules. Falsifiability! longship May 2018 #26

Yes, it would. guillaumeb May 2018 #22

I have a box.... NeoGreen May 2018 #3

Love Looney Toons. longship May 2018 #5

We see many. Snackshack May 2018 #7

This is about the likelihood that this universe would randomly conspire to... yallerdawg May 2018 #9

No. Ron Obvious May 2018 #12

Too heretical to consider, I know! yallerdawg May 2018 #14

You must have me mistaken for a religious person Ron Obvious May 2018 #17

K&R SharonClark May 2018 #32

It's very convenient for Philip Goff that Professor Hawking is dead. Mariana May 2018 #15

Saul on the road to Damascus? guillaumeb May 2018 #23

Some say... yallerdawg May 2018 #24

Not post #15 guillaumeb May 2018 #25

That's my stalker. yallerdawg May 2018 #28

Sad when that happens. guillaumeb May 2018 #34

Is that story one you take literally? MineralMan May 2018 #27

It may not have been a horse, guillaumeb May 2018 #35

Did Goff try to put words in a dead man's mouth? MineralMan May 2018 #29

NeverMind Naysayers yallerdawg Me. May 2018 #30