Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Deep13

(39,157 posts)
10. Suppose religion is performative rather than theologically based.
Mon May 6, 2013, 09:57 PM
May 2013

In the Middle Ages before, say, the 12th century, religion was something people did, not something they thought about. The did accept or believe that there was a spirit world inhabited by saints, demons, God and whatnot. Their practices were based on the use of ritual to entice the saints to intervene on their behalf for various needs. The specifics of their belief system did not exist in a detailed theology and would not until the consolidation of royal power at the end of the 12th c.

I should also mention that while Hitchens was a great writer and Dawkins a great scientist, neither of them are historians. Consequently, while their cases against the existence of gods or anything supernatural are pretty compelling, their indictments of religion as purely evil institutions is only partly convincing when one realizes how ecclesiastical and secular norms influenced each other. My point is, we do not have a case were merely not believing in god anymore by a large number of people will do much to cure the world's evil.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»How does your faith shape...»Reply #10