Religion
In reply to the discussion: Just a thought.... [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)That one sentence beautifully highlights how wrong you are in your whole posting philosophy here.
We have conflict because people think that how deeply felt and fervent their belief or "faith" is has anything to do with how true it is (the hallmark of religiously based thinking), rather than basing the strength of their convictions on the strength of the objective evidence supporting those convictions (the hallmark of the skeptical, rational thinking that serious and intelligent people base things on).
Conflicts are settled by reaching greater and greater agreement on what is really true, based on the accumulation of more and more evidence, not by whiny folk saying "Nyah, Nyah, you can't prove I'm wrong, so I'm just as right as you!!" It happens in science all the time. That's why you don't have thousands of sects of scientists, each doing their own thing and each thinking they're just a little bit righter than all the rest. But not in religion, because the people there think that faith should trump evidence, and that their beliefs need have no rational connection to reality.